this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
107 points (92.8% liked)

Futurology

1662 readers
693 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 21 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I seriously doubt 3D printed homes will ever be disruptive in any real sense. Effectively, it makes frame building easier. But that has never been the limiting factor in construction. All of the wiring, plumbing, etc is what is most difficult about building a home.

This company intends to do away with all that by just building a basic structure for people that need housing the most. Their "printer" is very cheap and fits in a shipping container. This is pretty much best case scenario, and it still would be upstaged by a shipping container of cinder blocks. The use case for 3D printed homes is luxury housing with funny shapes sold for high prices.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Hmm. Do you have an actual number on what % frame building is?

If so, it's mostly interesting for sky scrapers or infrastructure that have proportionately a lot more deadweight (although reinforcement is also troublesome if using concrete). I suppose it might be easier to get a robot working in a 3D printed frame, too, but that's another non-trivial technology on top of it.

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Average percentage of the building process, pg 3 so about 20% in the US, maybe more if you accept the interior finish. That being said I am highly skeptical this changes the needle, especially in the third world, because almost always if you have the land to build a shack, the cost of the shack isn’t going to keep you on the street.

Fundamentally, developers intuitively understand that building will be just about as profitable in ten years as now, but if you build to much now you will have an ‘oversupply crisis’ and the price as well as the associated profit margin will go down. Similarly, if you build a new building and are selling units very quickly, that means you’re below market price and should raise the price until they just barely sell, because that price jump will more than cover the cost of that apartment being empty for a few months or even years.

This all applies wether you’re in a shanty town in Brazil or in downtown Vancouver, and since even if you snapped your fingers and the cost to build in that shantytown halved it wouldn’t really change, I am really skeptical that even a highly transformative technology could change things, much less an expensive replacement for a few pallets of cinder blocks, a few friends, some drinks, and a weekend.

What you need is something like plentiful public housing providing a minimum quality of house at cost that the market must do better than, but groups like the IMF tend to despise countries doing things like that, because it’s a highly profitable investment when private foreigners do it but a reckless waste of money if the government tries to do the same thing.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks! Very interesting.

I suppose you could print the plumbing directly into a building, but that has obvious maintenance risks.

because almost always if you have the land to build a shack, the cost of the shack isn’t going to keep you on the street.

That's also thought-provoking. For scavenged sheet metal screwed together I'm guessing it's always true. Rammed earth is a bit more work, but I don't know how it compares to cinder block both performance and price-wise.

In any case, a 3D printer imported from the expensive West will take a long time to earn itself back.

load more comments (5 replies)