this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
88 points (95.8% liked)

World News

38529 readers
2662 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Reported as a copy/paste of a Mondoweiss article, which it is, but the comments are not restricted the same way posts are. So, for example, you can reply with a meme image, that's fine, it just can't be a post in and of itself.

[–] solo 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (8 children)

I understand what you say about the difference of posts and comments.

Reported as a copy/paste of a Mondoweiss article

Not too sure I understand to which rule this report would be based on anyway. And btw Mondoweiss is mentioned at the very top of the article. It's the same author, different outlets. Not a secret.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -5 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

If this were made a post instead of a comment, it would be removed as an unreliable source:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mondoweiss/

[–] solo 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ok, tbh the understanding I got from rule 3 is that it was more flexible, in the sense that it says "may be removed", not "will be removed", but thank you for taking the time to clarify this.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)