this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
51 points (90.5% liked)

Programming

17010 readers
322 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Really intriguing article about a SQL syntax extension that has apparently already been trialed at Google.

As someone who works with SQL for hours every week, this makes me hopeful for potential improvements, although the likelihood of any changes to SQL arriving in my sector before I retire seems slim.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

It's used that way in Elixir. I don't find it a problem.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

It's unnecessary, though - the keywords alone are sufficient. I dislike "clutter" syntax.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Possibly unpopular opinion: more languages should embrace unicode symbols in their syntax with multi-character ascii equivalents like Raku did. I set my vim config to automatically replace the ascii version with unicode. It wasn't hard, it makes the code a little more compact, and with good character choices, it stands out in an understandable way.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago

This should be done with font ligatures, not replacing character combinations with other characters that can't be typed normally

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)