this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
235 points (98.4% liked)

Ukraine

8235 readers
699 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aramis87@fedia.io 25 points 3 months ago (18 children)

I'm delighted we're sending these over to Ukraine (though it should have been done a long time ago).

Question: the F-16s are planes. Is there some reason we're loading them onto other planes for transport instead of flying them over?

[–] BatrickPateman@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Ease of transfer (one pilot vs multiple for a looooong flight, probably no refuel on the Antonow, and if so it eats less specialised stuff than the F-16s) and maybe even fuel efficiency, I would guess.

Also, one cargo plane raises less eye brows than a flock of fighters.

[–] ItWasTheDNS@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

AN-124’s are extremely inefficient - it’s probably stopping 2-3 times on route, but still easier to arrange than flying each plane.

[–] Alienmonkey@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Think they'd go west over the pacific or back across the US?

[–] ItWasTheDNS@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Back across the US - Portland Maine is a popular tech stop for the AN124’s and then probably someplace in the UK

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)