whenyellowstonehasitsday

You go against another nation, it creates a historical precedent for them to NOT work with your interests.

i like that for as long as you've argued against this, your argument still boils down to "but guys geopolitically the us WANTS to support israel"

yeah, we get that, that's why we're all saying the us could unilaterally decide to not support israel at any point

it's where you use your military resources to prevent any flying that you aren't a fan of in a certain zone that you don't want flying to happen in

sort of in the name

The history of Israel covers an area of the Southern Levant also known as Canaan, Palestine or the Holy Land, which is the geographical location of the modern states of Israel and Palestine.

very crucially, not "the entire middle east"

The first aggression in any act like this ALWAYS turns out to be the loser

oh so you mean the genocide that pushed the palestinians off their land?

please link to what you think my "original comment" was, because chronology wise, my original comment and this response combined make no sense, and i don't think that that's my fault

Germany and Finland both make stealth adversary systems. Finland even makes tracking systems that are specifically tailored to supersonic weapons.

You can't enforce a "No Fly Zone"

"omg why are you talking about supersonic capability"

i like that you specifically cited the two world wars and vietnam as examples of where logistics didn't matter, then fell back to "well, many non-land wars exist"

NON-land wars are even more an expression of logistics, because navies can't function without logistics, and air forces extremely very definitely can't function without logistics

my guy, the us can't house all its people, this is a non-argument for the position you're taking

maybe try responding to what's in the comment rather than what you want to be in the comment?

the un still has the power to deploy ground troops to a situation like the israel-gaza genocide, and the only thing stopping that from happening in the us veto

yes the f22 is notable because it's supersonic, not for any other reason, you definitely know what you're talking about

Britain makes one of the most capable air-air tracking systems in the world

britain regularly engages in friendly war games with the us, and regularly loses the very minute the f22 stops taking handicaps, what is your point?

the british made starstreak is probably one of the best manpads out there, and against an f22 it may as well be a piss-filled water balloon, because f22s don't fly low enough for manpads to be effective

the iron dome isn't even the theoretical israeli system that would intercept an f22. that would be david's sling, and i seriously doubt that raytheon, the american company contracted to create it, would be legally permitted to outsource a system that could shoot down the us's best plane

i provided 3 better solutions, and you limp-wristedly whined about how other countries in europe exist

think you confused yourself

the question wasn't "what can protesting do to make it stop"

it was "offer a solution to make it stop"

roblox-tier argument