unfazedbeaver

joined 1 year ago
 

Looking to set up a basic static website. What domain registrar should I go with? Would prefer something that has more privacy obviously. Any recommendations on hosting services (cannot host on own hardware right now)?

I would need something that has reasonable security, can work with LetsEncrypt SSL certs, and preferably has either privacy respecting analytics or no analytics. Don't want google to bother me or my website visitors.

[–] unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

This looks fantastic. Thanks for the link!

 

Are there any robot vacuums/mops that respect privacy; that don't map your house and phone home with the information?

[–] unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for the informative reply! I am curious; why does the framework laptop fall short of a dream laptop? Can you elaborate?

[–] unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Aw darn it. I was just about to switch to them too... Unless they get bought by an idealist buyer, they are just gonna get gobbled up by the big 3...

 

Title. Still haven't figured that one out. On mobile

[–] unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It seems meta wants "off the record" meetings with instance admins, such as Fosstodon https://fosstodon.org/@kev/110592625692688836

 

I say tell Meta to pound sand

[–] unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

In that case, assuming I read you correctly, I have to disagree. Privacy and security companies cannot rely on advertising or telemetry to be profitable; doing so is counter and paradoxical to their standing as a security/privacy company.

Bitwarden seems to be doing just fine. 1Password should be taking cues from them, not advertising revenue

[–] unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Being honest, its really hard for me to buy a pop_os laptop when the framework laptop exists. Being able to have that level of customizability and self repair options are just too good to pass up.

Suggestion: perhaps pop_os could collab with framework to make a pop_os laptop that is far more customizable and repairable than what is currently available

[–] unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Nah. Its just a tried and true step of enshitification. Fingers crossed that bitwarden is already profitable so we still have a good cloud password manager...

[–] unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Genuinely cannot tell if you are sarcastic or not.

[–] unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure its a good idea to recommend in privacy guides if it is a security issue or it breaks things...

[–] unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Halo, BOTW, eventually TOTK.

Gotta enjoy my life before university starts again...

[–] unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, he has often had high paying jobs outside YouTube. He started his YouTube channel as an incidental thing. He's not really super reliant on it due to his abilities and resume. I am hopeful he won't jump the shark

 

Just wanna take a moment to let people know about a very, very good and reputable tool for privacy and windows. I personally think it should be recommended on the main Privacy Guides site if you use windows. This is not a substitute for using Linux, however.

Linux is better, but if you have to use Windows, the Chris Titus Tech tool is quite easy to use, extremely powerful, and has been actively developed for a long time. You can set power-user privacy options easily, massively debloat your windows installation, install programs, and easily set your update settings to security only, if that is what you want.

https://christitus.com/windows-tool/

Just wondering about the communty's and mod's thoughts (like Jonah). I've used the tool for a long time and I am always impressed with it, especially as it comes from somebody who has a sterling reputation on computer and Linux know-how

view more: next ›