renzev

joined 8 months ago
[–] renzev@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (27 children)

Any browsers with good built-in adblocker besides brave? I feel like firefox's built-in content filtering does the very minimum, but I might be wrong

system-wide AdGuard

This is the way on mobile lol. The android rom I'm using comes with a built-in systemwide blocker, which I didn't know about for a very long time, so I was very confused when I saw other people using the same apps as me and seeing ads lol.

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago

I like your comment a lot because you can substitute a lot of different things for "snap" and it still ends up sounding like a very reasonable opinion

I feel like I would be more okay with leaded gasoline if it didn’t still have a lot of very real flaws.

I feel like I would be more okay with anarcho-capitalism if it didn’t still have a lot of very real flaws.

I feel like I would be more okay with PFAS-coated cookware if it didn’t still have a lot of very real flaws.

I feel like I would be more okay with single-use plastic bags if it didn’t still have a lot of very real flaws.

I feel like I would be more okay with cryptocurrencies if it didn’t still have a lot of very real flaws.

I feel like I would be more okay with generative AI if it didn’t still have a lot of very real flaws.

I feel like I would be more okay with eating highly processed meat if it didn’t still have a lot of very real flaws.

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I don't know, maybe

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

You are about to do something potentially harmful.
To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'

But speaking seriously, I think he tried it for a while and didn't like it either... not sure why specifically tho, I'll ask him

 
[–] renzev@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

It's not a miniscule gripe tho. Snap is still broken for many users, and relying on it for something as critical as a web browser is asking for trouble. Experimental technologies like snap should be opt-in for users who are willing to deal with the issues they create. Do they really expect a novice to see firefox's filepicker not behaving correctly, and think "Aha, an XDG desktop portal issue! Let me drop everything I'm doing and go troubleshoot that" ? Ubuntu is meant to be linux for normies, they don't have the time or the knowledge to deal with snap.

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Next step is probably a VM…

Boy, you're gonna love QubesOS

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

One of my friends spent like a month distrohopping just to find a debian-based distro that fits these two criteria:

  • First-class support for KDE

  • Isn't broken all the time

Ubuntu fails both. KDE Neon excels on the first one, but fails harder than ubuntu on the second one. Kubuntu as well. Debian has horridly outdated packages, and he refuses to use nix/flatpak. Tuxedo OS is obscure and broken. Mint is great, but installing KDE takes some effort.

He finally settled on Ubuntu Server with the native KDE package. Still has to do some weird incantations to banish snap tho.

How did things get this bad?

[–] renzev@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago

...what? Insurance companies are not a "barrier" between doctors and patients. What, do you think some sort of insurance gremlin will manifest out of the ground and kick you in the nuts if you try to visit a doctor while uninsured? Doctors don't care whether you're insured or not, as long as they get paid. Insurance companies exist to soften the blow of expensive treatment. The product is not getting completely fucked over if you get very unlucky, just like with any other insurance (life insurance, car insurance, whatever). It's kind of like bitcoin mining pools, but the other way around. Now, is mandatory health insurance justified? That's a different discussion.

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

most of what I posted describe actual well known problems with Android. You would know that if you used Android.

Damn, you're right, maybe I should do some reading on these "well known problems" that I haven't once experienced in my three years of using android. Sounds pretty bad /s

^ Edgy sarcasm aside, everything you said really is news to me. Is there really that much difference between different android ROMs? I'm running /e/-os on my phone (lineageos fork), and I don't think I've ever had issues with notifications or this "Doze" thing. I can't say for lemmy app / youtube music tho, I don't use those. Though I can relate a little bit to the third-party launcher thing -- I have MLauncher, and a recent update just completely crippled the search functionality for no reason.

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, but that's just because Debian's software catalog is deliberately full of outdated and/or broken packages. It's like that on purpose. On most other distros native packages trump third-party install scripts any day of the week. On Debian you can just use Nix or Flatpak to get good packages.

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

This looks like one of those PC/Console comparison memes from the early days of pcmasterrace. I like it!

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TBH cable transfer on android can be pretty shit as well. Like, if you luck out with the MTP implementation on both your phone and your computer, then it Just Works (TM). But in many cases (like mine) it's a buggy mess. I used to have a script that would sync music from my laptop to my phone with rsync, and I would have to run it like three times to actually transfer everything, because each time like 10% of the files would just... not make it across the cable lol. Now I just do it over WIFI. I really wish we could go back to the old days when plugging in your phone would just expose the microsd card as a block storage device.

 

It's impressive how duckduckgo manages to be so much better than bing despite being a frontend for bing

 
 

I heard some people say theyre the same thing, but others are adamant that they have different meanings. Which is it?

 
 
 
 
 
 

I've just been playing around with https://browserleaks.com/fonts . It seems no web browser provides adequate protection for this method of fingerprinting -- in both brave and librewolf the tool detects rather unique fonts that I have installed on my system, such as "IBM Plex" and "UD Digi Kyokasho" -- almost certainly a unique fingerprint. Tor browser does slightly better as it does not divulge these "weird" fonts. However, it still reveals that the google Noto fonts are installed, which is by far not universal -- on a different machine, where no Noto fonts are installed, the tool does not report them.

For extra context: I've tested under Linux with native tor browser and flatpak'd Brave and Librewolf.

What can we do to protect ourselves from this method of fingerprinting? And why are all of these privacy-focused browsers vulnerable to it? Is work being done to mitigate this?

 

Hi all! I recently built a cold storage server with three 1TB drives configured in RAID5 with LVM2. This is my first time working with LVM, so I'm a little bit overwhelmed by all its different commands. I have some questions:

  1. How do I verify that none of the drives are failing? This is easy in case of a catastrophic drive failure (running lvchange -ay <volume group> will yell at you that it can't find a drive), but what about subtler cases?
  2. Do I ever need to manually resync logical volumes? Will LVM ever "ask" me to resync logical volumes in cases other than drive failure?
  3. Is there any periodic maintenance that I should do on the array, like running some sort of health check?
  4. Does my setup prevent me from data rot? What happens if a random bit flips on one of the hard drives? Will LVM be able to detect and correct it? Do I need to scan manually for data rot?
  5. LVM keeps yelling at me that it can't find dmeventd. From what I understand, dmeventd doesn't do anything by itself, it's just a framework for different plugins. This is a cold storage server, meaning that I will only boot it up every once in a while, so I would rather perform all maintenance manually instead of delegating it to a daemon. Is it okay to not install dmeventd?
  6. Do I need to monitor SMART status manually, or does LVM do that automatically? If I have to do it manually, is there a command/script that will just tell me "yep, all good" or "nope, a drive is failing" as opposed to the somewhat overwhelming output of smartctl -a?
  7. Do I need to run SMART self-tests periodically? How often? Long test or short test? Offline or online?
  8. The boot drive is an SSD separate from the raid array. Does LVM keep any configuration on the boot drive that I should back up?

Just to be extra clear: I'm not using mdadm. /proc/mdstat lists no active devices. I'm using the built-in raid5 feature in lvm2. I'm running the latest version of Alpine Linux, if that makes a difference.

Anyway, any help is greatly appreciated!


How I created the array:

pvcreate /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
vgcreate myvg /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc

pvresize  /dev/sda
pvresize  /dev/sdb
pvresize  /dev/sdc

lvcreate --type raid5 -L 50G -n vol1 myvg
lvcreate --type raid5 -L 300G -n vol2 myvg
lvcreate --type raid5 -l +100%FREE -n vol3 myvg

For education purposes, I also simulated a catastrophic drive failure by zeroing out one of the drives. My procedure to repair the array was as follows, which seemed to work correctly:

pvcreate /dev/sda
vgextend myvg /dev/sda
vgreduce --remove --force myvg
lvconvert --repair myvg/vol1
lvconvert --repair myvg/vol2
lvconvert --repair myvg/vol3
 

Fun fact: Torx screwdrivers are compatible with Torx Plus screws, but Trox Plus screwdrivers are only compatible with Torx screws that are one size larger

view more: next ›