remotelove

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
196
[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

Those are good printers. I put about 6 different resin types through them, and did get my optimal settings for fine detail because I was curious. It's just pointless for what I do, s'all.

But yes, depending on what your goals are for printing, there is a fuck ton of room for speed improvements.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I have a pair of Mono 6ks's and yeah. Their settings are even across most of the resins in their slicer. I use the same settings between ABS, nylons and clear resins but just for functional prints. (Precision only matters in key spots for me.)

I will say this though: Their base settings work for me, which is super different than what I was used to with FDM.

Lift speed is determined more by the plastic sheet type, and "8k resin" may or may not be a little thinner and that is generally the only difference, if at all. (+8k resin is almost always marketing wank.) nFEP is the most common way to go for the detail/speed tradeoff.

(The Blu nylons are thick as hell though, so the lift speed/dwell can actually matter.)

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago (4 children)

It's generic for thicker resins. A higher lift and a short pause is normal so that resin can flow back under the print where it just separated.

Just tune it down for your particular resins.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Have you read any of his speeches since 2016? He changes subject several times each sentence and that is just the default setting.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not much. It's the space around the ship that moves, not the ship itself.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Sorry to fuck a joke up by being a nerd, but I don't think weight (mass) matters much in a ship that could travel warp 10. The ship wouldn't have enough momentum to matter all that much.

All you did was give your cargo to someone else, I think. I mean, I'll take it if you think it would help.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As far as my proof on link-boy is that his history kinda proves that he doesn't research shit. His go-to method seems to be find-link-vomit-link. There is no fucking way he would have time to dig into that stuff based on volume alone. Is that "proof"? No. It's a damn good assumption as I also could shit out a few dozen links after one Google search, too.

If he does "do his research" and happens to have a list of links at the ready, that is just weird or it's someone with a motive other than showing how smart they are.

By definition, you are correct on some points, btw. Dissent is dissent. However, dissent with bad information is just poor form. Endlessly shitposting like OP does is hardly quality dissent: OP just pushes narratives with cartoons and it reads like a fucking state media source. You can find the same style of shit all over right-wing media sources as well: Repeat the same basic points ad-nauseum.

As far as link-boy is concerned, I suppose he can dissent all over the place as much as he wants as well. It's doesn't change his history of link-flooding.

Also, "despite increasingly popular opinion" is supposed to convince me of something based on the rumored opinions of what? Your own social bubble? Really?

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Lulz. I was reminded of the conspiracy theory "jet fuel can't melt steal beams", for some reason.

(While that statement is technically true, metals can get extremely soft while they are heated close to their actual melting points. You know this, but it's surprisingly easy for many to overlook this basic fact because of the specific data on melting points and such.)

Thanks for filling in the gaps, btw. Data good. Nom.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How the fuck you wrapped your last sentence in is beyond me, but anywho...

Dissent is not spouting off Russian propaganda verbatim. You know, like quoting every single line vomited out by every Russian state media source. (OP)

Dissent is also not searching for every internet based opinion piece with a flashy headline that aligns with a specific view. I could find a hundred more that align with my views, as an example. (re: link-boy in this thread.)

We all should know that Russia invading Ukraine "because Nazis" is complete bullshit. If you didn't notice Russian media and government officials repeating that justification is just that: repeating things enough so people begin to believe it. (That is easy with state controlled media, btw.)

What we have is a failed case of seeing the forest through the trees and what ~~Russian~~ Putin's goals have obviously been for years now: Rebuilding the USSR. (Nevermind that Crimea was not ethnic Russian until the local population just disappeared, somehow.)

Dissent is actually showing, to the best of ones abilities, real cause for action. A person could actually read all of the source articles they post, compare figures and assemble something that might be worth something in an argument. This takes a fuck ton of work, actually. All sources need to be considered and not just select articles that are vomited out in these kinds of posts.

What link-boy is doing is just flooding threads with data, regardless of it is correct or not. It's not proving any points and likely just posted to flash out headlines, which people notoriously take at face value.

Then we need to loop back to the "reputable sources" bit. Nearly anyone can submit articles to these places with little review because "content". To properly use these articles, you have to dig. You need to understand the authors, the sources and the motivation. Again, link-boy is likely not doing this. If he is, it's still shitty referencing.

Above all else, this conflict has proven that Russia is a paper tiger, mainly by showing their wonder-weapons are crap. This is not actually about the tech itself: It's shown how Russian government has overstated just about everything about their capabilities. Not only did the world start to believe their own propaganda, Russians drank their own cool aid and thought they could just roll Ukraine in a couple of days, with or without western interference.

We don't need shit-memes or walls of old links to show how Russia has manipulated the narrative over the last few years. All we need to do is watch how poorly they are performing on the battlefield against a country a tenth their size. We can watch Russian media and how they continue to posture and threaten with nukes. (That is a stupid play, and they know it.)

What's even funnier, is that Lukashenko actually dumped out a couple weeks ago that Ukraine was already "denazified". Oops. If that is actually "true", why hasn't this "special military operation" been called off? Why is Russia at a full wartime economy now for what is likely illegal to call a "war"?

Fucking grow up, is my point. You want to get all script-flippy about "sPeAkiG diSsEnT" when the people "dissenting" don't know what the actual fuck they are posting with.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hey. OP. ...

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Eyyy! One mac down, one to go.

It was just a shame to have this spare compute just sitting around and am glad it has avoided the recycling bin for at least another 4-5 years. (I don't like throwing electronics away. I'll even harvest components off of old stuff before it gets tossed, usually.)

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Mor links plz.

Edit: Geez. You really do like to find any link on the internets that justifies anything you want to believe, don't ya?

 
 

I just stumbled across this beast that was previously owned by a Russian sniper. It's got characteristics of an F-17 but it looks like the stock as been drilled out in places (or replaced) and I am about 60% sure that those are Vortex optics. Any ideas?

 

When browsing on lemmy.ca/c/all and I click through to a post, the local source instance and community for a post is shown as lemmy.world/c/hot. The source instance is something completely different and shown in the post info bar below the title.

This can get awkward when I think I am commenting on a post I think is on lemmy.world or lemmy.ca when it might actually be lemmy.ml.

Highlighting the source instance a little better would be super awesome.

274
My Lemmy Rule (lemmy.ca)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by remotelove@lemmy.ca to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

Edit: The above Connect filter only works for title posts. It doesn't seem to filter comments or community names.

I mention this only because of some questions here and how people are going to the effort to censor out comments on this post.

 

Oops! I actually ment to post this in a ham radio community. RF is still RF, so it kinda fits here if you squint a little bit.

 
 

Tectonic activity bends rocks all the time, even hard ones like granite. That takes a ton of heat, pressure and time. It also makes sense that in the right conditions, sheets of rock simply don't have the room to shatter so they must bend.

Have we been able to do the same in a lab and would it have any commercial use? Bending a random bit of hard rock would be an interesting novelty, for sure.

 

I am creating a simulation to evolve simple, multi-cell organisms. (Just for fun!)

Neural networks are fairly easy to evolve, even more so when it's done by random mutations and not actual training. Build an ANN at random and introduce mutations with every generation. The ANNs that accomplish simple goals (by pure chance) live to duplicate with every evolutionary cycle. Fairly easy stuff.

I am stumped when it comes to creating something that would simulate the genes that represent a body. After some reading today, there isn't much info on how cells form into specific shapes for arms, hands, organs, etc. (I am sure there is a ton of data, but I don't know what subject to Google.)

Genes can create the patterns for specific chemicals and cells. How to cells then develop into functional body parts? What makes a heart the shape of a heart?

I think that having a better understanding of that concept can help me develop a framework for physical evolution, even if it as a very tiny scale.

(Putting the ANN in charge of controlling those different body parts is also easy. It's just a matter of allowing those physical traits to evolve first.)

 
 
 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›