the /usr/bin/krunner executable is owned by the plasma-workspace package. It has a lot of dependencies. So yeah, you basically need a huge chunk of kde/plasma to run it.
A pretty similar Qt-based launcher utility (not quite so good in some areas, possibly better in some) is called albert, if you don't want to use plasma anymore.
Maybe check out Pop! OS
But, yes, nearly all linux software will run on any distro. And even a fair amount of windows software will run on any of them with WINE (or VirtualBox if desperate). Occasionally commercial software will get packaged in an "installer" format a particular distro doesn't know how to install. A fairly rare situation, for which there are almost always work-arounds. You can cross that bridge if you ever encounter it.
I also agree it looks like some kind of sedum (in a bit of a sad state), but just wanted to add that sedum is known commonly as stonecrop in some places. In case you're looking around in a garden store or something, they may be called stonecrop there.
What features are locked? I've only ever used the f-droid version, and haven't noticed anything blocked. But I don't use it much (unfortunately).
Never heard of Readwise. Interesting concept.
Not going to be nearly as convenient, but you can use google lens (part of Google assistant I think, or stand alone app) to quickly OCR a page into selectable text which then could be copied into a notes app or something. You'd have manually add a reference.
Anyhow maybe you can figure out a workflow using Google lens for the OCR copy/past part, that isn't too onerous, if no other solutions appear. Let us know! .
Interesting perspective. I had not considered the aesthetic angle.
Friend's grandfather used to say...
The hurrier I go the behinder I get.
I was on digg as well as reddit. I always liked reddit a lot better and was always baffled as to why digg was so much more popular. Reddit always felt more diverse (in topics) and organic (user driven) to me. I guess others had a different view.
Sadly, no one no one seems to remember kuro5hin. Barely even me. It had its moments though.
Where did you find the actual study? The link in the above article leads to https://purl.stanford.edu/vb515nd6874 which has an abstract, but I can't see the study.
The title of this article is deplorably sensationalistic, but the article itself isn't bad. I guess they couldn't fit this into the title:
It requires a written application and assessments from two independent medical practitioners, including at least one specialized in their condition if the applicant is not near their natural death.
The article also notes:
Even after the change in the legislation [to allow non-foreseeable death applications], about 98% of the assisted deaths in 2021 were people deemed near their natural death, according to Health Canada data.
Maybe journa.host public feed? https://journa.host/public/local
Or better, use the elk.zone interface: https://elk.zone/journa.host/public/local
It's a mastodon instance for verified journalists, and so.... you know. If it bleeds it leads...
(I'm not [entirely] serious... just as the cartoon the post link leads to isn't.... [entirely?]...)
Here is the study, "Assessment of Stoichiometric Autocatalysis across Element Groups", linked in the last paragraph of the article for your enjoyment: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.3c07041