Out of those you listed, nuclear is the least flexible in terms of output regulation. PV with batteries is the most flexible.
oyo
joined 1 year ago
Yeah the poster above you is wrong. Solar is WAY less than half the price.
Solar plus batteries are already cheaper than nuclear, and only going down. Nuclear has always gotten more expensive over time. For the cost of the most recently completed nuclear plant in the US they could have built 12 times the nameplate capacity worth of solar with 24 hours of battery backup. (A totally unnecessary amount of dispatchability.)
Solar and batteries easily "pay" for their manufacturing carbon emissions within 1-2 years max (as does nuclear). This payback period only goes down as the grid gets greener.
It means get off your lazy ass and quit that dead end job. Start your own business selling chia underwear. You can't afford the startup costs? Just get a couple mil loan from your dad.
It only applies to publicly traded companies, which tend to be beholden to the "woke, oppressive majority" of society. Private companies would remain free to funnel unlimited funds to their choice of shithead.
I want everything to be toggle switches. If I could get a keyboard made of 105 classic toggle switches it would be worth the effort to type with it.
Tax prep software companies and tax prep services in general.
It smells and feels awful, though.
Newsom dialing back the progressivism for his presidential run.
I see you haven't met the Lemmy fake-communists yet
Batteries are already cheaper than nuclear.
Come on... You can hate Stein all you want for being a spoiler, but there is zero evidence she has any connection to Putin.