nooneescapesthelaw

joined 1 year ago
[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

It's bread stapled to a tree

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

I have never heard of dis man

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Holy shit dude you are awesome, thanks alot!

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In this case the jpegs themselves change everytime you zoom in, so you zoom in a little it loads a new set of higher quality Jpegs.

Do you remember the tool you are talking about?

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Try torrenting on another device (like your phone) to see if the issue is your network. Also try a non qbittorent client

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Op:

but even with the VPN disabled it doesn't work.

Comments:

Have you tried changing your vpn???

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I think you might be underestimating these guys a little, however skepticism is a part of science.

Replication experiments are being done right now so we'll see what happens, but I'm sure they have adjusted for that

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

This article skips over a few points, heres the paper:

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2312751120?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed

So your idea seems plausible at first, but more information leads to the proposed photo molecular effect:

Illumination of hydrogel under solar or visible-spectrum light-emitting diode leads to evaporation rates exceeding the thermal evaporation limit, even in hydrogels without additional absorbers.

Also the absorption of both the water and gel are negligible

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

I think the author's theory about the photo molecular effect are right!

Basically they say that the photons cleave water molecules from the surface of the hydrogels.

At first i was not convinced but then i read the abstract of the journal article (its not on scihub yet) and it changed my mind, the news article skipped over a few points:

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2312751120?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The means of production are not entirely owned by a seperate class nor is the barrier to entry for many industries so high that it is entirely impossible for the average joe to enter.

Sure some industries are nigh impossible to get into, like pharmaceuticals for example, there are much bigger industries that have lower barriers like machine shops (which are really medium entry but you can scale them), and manufacturing via 3d print hubs.

Not to mention aoftware development which is a fucking wonder when it comes to potential money vs barrier to entry.

Certain construction contractors and engineering consulting firms can be opened up with fairly low barrier to entry.

I'm sleepy so my replies may not seem very coherent so tell me if you don't understand what im saying

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really, every bullet fired in ukraine weakens russia, an invading country and therefore it hurts soldiers.

The war in palestine kills innocent civilians and children

view more: ‹ prev next ›