letsgo

joined 1 year ago
[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Sorry I'm not well enough versed in American politics to know who's blue or red.

Whether you should vote or not doesn't depend on the people around you. It is your right to have your say. The result is the cumulative effect of everyone in your area doing the same. Whether you think you're surrounded by millions of blues or millions of reds doesn't make any difference. Your perception may be incorrect, and your analysis, that there is literally zero chance that your vote will matter, is incorrect.

Nobody knows the results of an election until the votes are in and have been counted. It doesn't matter that your area has always been red, blue, green, turquoise, pink or whatever. Areas can change allegiance, and it is by individuals getting out and voting.

If you don't vote, you strengthen the position of those who vote the other way. It is not considered a protest vote because the system would prefer to consider this as voter apathy. If you want to register a protest vote and "none of the above" isn't an option, find the official way to spoil your ballot paper and do that, but whatever you do, get out and vote.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

True. So the most appropriate solution would be for JSO to perform a LIMITED disruptive protest. This would - and we know because it did - hit the papers and everyone would know about it, spreading the message, and aside from those directly affected would gain them a lot of support.

But then you stop. You've done what you needed to. The message is out there, people are talking and thinking about it. And writing to their MPs to express support. And changing the nation's direction via legitimate democratic process.

This is where JSO went so badly wrong. They didn't/wouldn't stop. They kept on disrupting the lives of those around them. They kept ignoring complaints from the public and warnings from the police. They went on to chuck paint at artwork, snooker tables and Stonehenge*. By becoming a bunch of complete and utter wankmuppets they have destroyed any public support they might have had and are now little more than environmental terrorists.

*Yeah I know the details, decomposable powder blah blah. The point is: NOBODY CARES. The only response they get now is "oh no not fucking JSO again".

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Great post. Fnrb wijjk blerb phtooie wagawaga nkkjqqz frup walawala madooie.

Edit: What do you mean you haven't got a clue what I'm talking about?

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Probably have to go old-skool and actually be at the machine.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

True, but knowing what the fix might be means you can Google it and see what comes back. It was on StackOverflow for example, but at the time of this comment has been taken offline for moderation - whatever that means.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

I'll drink to that.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

No, a different Paul; see Acts 9, 4-5.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Here in the UK, food banks are very often run by churches. My wife routinely buys stuff she knows they need. We are both Christians.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 21 points 4 months ago (3 children)

No, what he's saying is that since all actions start with a thought (for example, one does not just commit adultery; there's a period of "I wouldn't mind a bit of that"), it can be helpful to consider the thought as bad as the action for the purpose of weeding that behaviour out of our lives. Not that the thought is as bad as the action, because clearly it isn't. Continuing with the example: when we find ourselves thinking like that, it is at that point we should catch ourselves and think about something else instead. Attempting to stop yourself just before you rip her knickers off is unlikely to be quite as successful.

Similarly 29 and 30 are not suggestions of actual self-mutilation. Your eye cannot cause you to sin; it is exaggeration for the sake of making the point. You see something, you think about it, then you act on that thought. But if the act is sinful then we should attempt to stop the act at the earliest possible point.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago

Or maybe he's worked for some small companies where none of those is a full time job and hiring 27 people to sit around for 97% of their time is not likely to be considered a terribly good business decision.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Well everybody likes to think they're original.

(I did check the comments before I posted this and am vaguely disappointed that I am.)

view more: ‹ prev next ›