dsilverz

joined 2 months ago
[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 2 points 34 minutes ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago)

This reminds me of a currently trending Brazilian meme (amostradinho) that I'll translate here: "Huh, what audacity! In my presence? I like this way, the lil' exhibitionistic, let me fill your ticket, 'Once upon a day...', and that day is today, it's now!"

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 12 points 18 hours ago

It also doesn't prevent advertisements carried through the website's own domain. For example, lots of video platforms send their advertisements through the same domain as the content's domain, so if you block that domain, you'll also block the possibility of watching any content there. That's why you need to have ad-blocking within the browser.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago

Aside from downloading and changing PKGBUILD directly, there is an AUR helper named Paru that shows the PKGBUILD contents before using it to build the package. I'm not sure, but seems like it opens inside a terminal text editor, so you can make changes before building.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 days ago

There was a similar question at another community. I'll verbatim my reply:

As a syncretic Luciferian currently, I’d say esoteric and occult books/grimoires as well. Everything that’s deemed “demonic” by christianity should be safely archived.

There are many, many authors and books that hold importance for esoteric and occult studies and practices.

An example that comes to mind are the books written by Anton LaVey, especially the The Satanic Bible. As he was american, so are his books’ first copies from, so a greater risk of those copies being seized or something.

While this risk wouldn’t be the same for all corpora written by Aleister Crowley, as he was English so the first copies aren’t at american soil (if I guessed correctly), I’m not sure how far a christotyrannical regime would go for “serving God’s will”.

So, in summary, I’d say everything should be archived. Both physically and digitally. It’s worth mentioning how Internet Archive is being attacked: the Internet Archive holds many digital copies of important esoteric and occult knowledge as well. If Internet Archive goes permanently down, it’d ripple to other sites such as sacred-texts.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As a Brazilian nervously watching the unfolding of a potentially global mess, I bring you the best Brazil can offer: memes! Here's a pretty relatable one (Original cartoon from Maurício de Souza, Turma da Mônica)

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Throughout all my jobs, I've been always systematic in not creating any friendship or relationship. That's because I feel like workplace problems could affect the relation, or vice-versa, when personal disagreements could affect the workplace, because the humans involved would the same, me and my coworker. Imagine dating a coworker and then, eventually, falling into some disagreement (every relationship has one), then one of you (you or them) decides it's better to temporarily go apart so to settle things, but you both will need to see each one face to face tomorrow. You'll look in their eyes and you'll find a hard time distinguishing between your love and your coworker, because they're the same person (you still love them). There's also the presence of falsehood within workplaces, people that seems nice until they're at your back conspiring against you, trying to push you to the cliff. I faced lots of falsehood throughout my jobs. Careers sometimes involve competing against others and there are lots of people that takes this competition spirit too far, diminishing your job and your life for them to get some advantage (i.e. a better position within the company, a better wage, or even "for sadistic fun" of seeing others to be fired).

Maybe I'm wrong, but that's how I ever felt about workplace relations, I always tried to keep the workplace restricted to my professional persona. I'll be kind and helpful, but I'll kinda "robotic" to my coworkers and bosses. You could correctly guess that this led me to being a solitary person, something I actually always was, because I'm the typical former nerd colleague back at the high school, the shy, social awkward kind, never had real true friends, and love seems like some extraterrestrial fictional thing to me (not that I'm not capable of feeling love for someone because I once felt, but externalizing it and turning it into a relationship only happened in dreams, I guess).

So, in my opinion, it's not a trustworthy thing to make friends at work, especially if it involves possibilities of higher positions and/or higher wages, or a narcissistic boss that wants to be worshiped. But, as I said, maybe I'm wrong.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 8 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I totally relate. There's this thing in introverts, social battery, that is used to deplete quickly.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The problem is beyond social media accounts. Modern life makes us to have digital things, "apps". As much as I'd benefit from it (I'm a programmer), I can't help but recognize how dangerous is this digital dependence and requirement. Not only our entire lives become bits and bytes across gazillions of platforms, they're out of our real control: from advertising platforms to hackers, the online information kind of awaits to fall on third-party hands.

How many of our information is now inside the training data from major AI models (as much as I like some aspects of AIs, that's a fact), such as GPT-4, Claude Somnet and, especially, Google's Gemini, whose company is responsible for more than 90% of the search engine market while also responsible for our smartphones' brains, not just Android but things embedded on Apple's ecosystems as well?

But people only notice how far our digital footprint goes when there's some serious thing such as the risk of persecution from the government. People decide to delete their accounts hoping that it'll lead to their data being magically erased and, as a programmer, I say: no, our data remains, there's no DELETE * FROM users WHERE id = your_id, there's actually a UPDATE users SET deleted=CURRENT_TIME() WHERE id = your_id that's not the same thing (it just marks your account as deleted, but all the data remains for whatever time period they wish, not even mentioning periodic database backups that'll preserve your data in the hands of that platform)... not even mentioning how your data could've already been assimilated through platform integrations (API) by third-party partners such as advertisers. There's no way to force the erasure.

Yeah, there's the law such as GDPR's "Right to be forgotten", but there's a Brazilian saying "O que os olhos não veem o coração não sente" (What the eyes can't see, the heart can't feel). A platform can "confirm the account deletion" but they can keep the data without anyone's knowledge. It's worse: there are laws that require the companies to keep the data for some time (here in Brazil, for example, companies need to keep data for five years, because the justice could need the data in order to solve some investigation).

So, I don't like to be a harbinger of doom, but our digital traces will never actually entirely disappear from the Internet.. especially if you guys are thinking of avoiding the incoming persecution from a new government. Online data remains as far as we couldn't tell. And this includes way beyond social media platforms: it also includes your apps such as, I dunno, your Starbucks accounts? Your Amazon accounts? Everything is data that can be analyzed among a big data and traced back to each one's preferences, including political preferences... I'm sorry to say that, but I need to transmit this knowledge as a developer.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 days ago

There are many, many authors and books that hold importance for esoteric and occult studies and practices.

An example that comes to mind are the books written by Anton LaVey, especially the The Satanic Bible. As he was american, so are his books' first copies from, so a greater risk of those copies being seized or something.

While this risk wouldn't be the same for all corpora written by Aleister Crowley, as he was English so the first copies aren't at american soil (if I guessed correctly), I'm not sure how far a christotyrannical regime would go for "serving God's will".

So, in summary, I'd say everything should be archived. Both physically and digitally. It's worth mentioning how Internet Archive is being attacked: the Internet Archive holds many digital copies of important esoteric and occult knowledge as well. If Internet Archive goes permanently down, it'd ripple to other sites such as sacred-texts.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

As a syncretic Luciferian currently, I'd say esoteric and occult books/grimoires as well. Everything that's deemed "demonic" by christianity should be safely archived.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 days ago

the US becomes a third world banana republic

As a Brazilian, living in a third world banana republic, I couldn't agree more! US is somehow mimicking our past elections, particularly our most recent election.

 

cross-posted from: https://thelemmy.club/post/17993801

First of all, let me explain what "hapax legomena" is: it refers to words (and, by extension, concepts) that occurred just once throughout an entire corpus of text. An example is the word "hebenon", occurring just once within Shakespeare's Hamlet. Therefore, "hebenon" is a hapax legomenon. The "hapax legomenon" concept itself is a kind of hapax legomenon, IMO.

According to Wikipedia, hapax legomena are generally discarded from NLP as they hold "little value for computational techniques". By extension, the same applies to LLMs, I guess.

While "hapax legomena" originally refers to words/tokens, I'm extending it to entire concepts, described by these extremely unknown words.

I am a curious mind, actively seeking knowledge, and I'm constantly trying to learn a myriad of "random" topics across the many fields of human knowledge, especially rare/unknown concepts (that's how I learnt about "hapax legomena", for example). I use three LLMs on a daily basis (GPT-3, LLama and Gemini), expecting to get to know about words, historical/mythological figures and concepts unknown to me, lost in the vastness of human knowledge, but I now know, according to Wikipedia, that general LLMs won't point me anything "obscure" enough.

This leads me to wonder: are there LLMs and/or NLP models/datasets that do not discard hapax? Are there LLMs that favor less frequent data over more frequent data?

 

First of all, let me explain what "hapax legomena" is: it refers to words (and, by extension, concepts) that occurred just once throughout an entire corpus of text. An example is the word "hebenon", occurring just once within Shakespeare's Hamlet. Therefore, "hebenon" is a hapax legomenon. The "hapax legomenon" concept itself is a kind of hapax legomenon, IMO.

According to Wikipedia, hapax legomena are generally discarded from NLP as they hold "little value for computational techniques". By extension, the same applies to LLMs, I guess.

While "hapax legomena" originally refers to words/tokens, I'm extending it to entire concepts, described by these extremely unknown words.

I am a curious mind, actively seeking knowledge, and I'm constantly trying to learn a myriad of "random" topics across the many fields of human knowledge, especially rare/unknown concepts (that's how I learnt about "hapax legomena", for example). I use three LLMs on a daily basis (GPT-3, LLama and Gemini), expecting to get to know about words, historical/mythological figures and concepts unknown to me, lost in the vastness of human knowledge, but I now know, according to Wikipedia, that general LLMs won't point me anything "obscure" enough.

This leads me to wonder: are there LLMs and/or NLP models/datasets that do not discard hapax? Are there LLMs that favor less frequent data over more frequent data?

 

The following story was written by me, playing with the concept of myse en abyme (among other deeper concepts within the text, such as philosophical and esoteric intertwined concepts).

Myse en abyme is a type of art that contains the art within itself, creating a meta-narrative. I'm sharing this to bring this concept to those who were not familiar with it.

I'm using a made-up pseudonym "Bob DeLorean" to compose the text.

Please let me know if i'm sharing the wrong way (i.e. if I'm supposed to publish it through another platform and sharing links, instead of sharing the entire story through a Lemmy post).


How do you make a story within the story itself? - A meta-fiction By Bob DeLorean (my pseudonym for this Myse En Abyme kind of story)

"How do you make a story within the story itself? Bob was wondering that. 'You start by thinking about the steps. It's quite simple, son, take this ancient book. It's yours. Literally yours', answered the priest, while handing a dusty book entitled 'How do you make a story within the story itself' authored by 'Bob'.

He opened it, just to face his own story right at the first page: 'How do you make a story within the story itself? Bob was wondering that'.

– Hey, it's my story! – he wondered, scared. – Where did you get it?

The priest answered:

– A long, long time ago, some minutes before this sentence, Bob started to wrote. Look, son, you're a prophet, a really gifted prophet. You should be proud of yourself.

– It doesn't make sense. How should I... how should I know?

– You really wrote it, son. Turn the page.

Bob turned the page. The second page started... 'Bob turned the page. The second page started...'. The rest was blurry, but gradually faded into existence. His eyes couldn't believe it. He read the next line: 'The rest was blurry, but gradually fading into existence'.

– Which type of witchcraft is this?

– It's not, son. It's your story, you really should be proud of yourself.

– But you said that I wrote this, right?

– Exactly, son. You wrote that.

– And how I can't remember?

– You do remember, son. Read it again.

He tried to look the next pages. All blurry, because we're still going to the third page. Bob should know that.

– Wait.. I heard it. Who's that?

It's me, Bob.

– No, I am Bob. You're not.

I'm Bob, Bob.

– Wh... No way! Tell my last name.

It's DeLorean. Bob DeLorean is our name. He looks surprised.

– Of course I'm surprised. What happens with me, at the end?

You mean... with us. Well, for you, I have somber news. You vanish as soon as I stop writing. As for me, I dunno, I'll probably write other texts.

– It's not fair. Am I gonna die?

– Hey, son, are you talking to God? – the priest asked.

– N... no. I'm talking to a voice that's claiming to be myself. Take this book back.

A mysterious force was stopping Bob from giving away his own book. You can't do it, Bob. You know you can't. Only you can read the book, for now.

– He's claiming that only me can read the book. And he keeps narrating some story, this story, it's creepy.

– Oh, it's God! God's right, son! The book is yours. It's meant for yourself.

– You should try to read it, priest...

– I can't defy God, my son. If the book is yours, I can't even touch it.

– You touched it minutes ago.

– It was God's mission to deliver the book for you, son. I simply delivered it as God wisely ordered me.

Hey, Bob, are you listening?

– Uh... yeah?

Say to the priest that he can stop calling me as god.

– Hey... priest... Can you hear him?

– No, son. I can't hear God.

– He asked you to stop calling him "god".

– Beware of your words, son. He's God.

– But he literally asked me. Look...

Bob proceeded to the fourth page, where I said 'Say to the priest that he can stop calling me as god'.

– Wait... I c... I can read it, son!

– Exactly! See?

– If God asked to not be called God, I'll respect God's Will and I'll stop calling God as God.

Humph...

– He seems infuriated.

– I can see it, son. It's right below the prophetic paragraph you delivered to me.

I'm becoming tired. I should sto...

– No!! I'm gonna die if you stop!

I don't care, Bob.

– But I'm... I'm you, you said it before!

Yeah. I'm you, Bob. And I'm deciding to stop my own story: the ancient book was slim, with five pages only. The priest and Bob went to sleep. Don't worry, I'm taking care of them. Maybe we'll awake inside another book in the future."

 

Firstly, sorry if this is not the adequate place for my question; if it's the case, let me know.

The title may seem confusing, so let me detail it: I'm more of a commenter person, and some of my comments are replied, and Lemmy notifies me of those direct replies. However, there are moments when those replies receive third-party replies, so my comment turns into some kind of "sub-thread", something that's interesting for me to read and follow. For those third-party replies, I don't receive notifications, so I have to access each direct reply that was notified so to find possible "sub-threads".

There seems to me to be no option to "receive notifications for this post/comment/reply", only the automatic opt-in of notifications for direct replies.

So really isn't there such an option? Or is this an instance-specific feature and the instance I belong to (thelemmy.club) don't have it?

view more: next ›