Ignorant of history, and willing to loudly announce it. Start by googling the Soviet model and then graph it. Now look at the fediverse.
The point in Amish communities is they often result in terrible abuse, unreported and unprosecuted. I've been lucky enough to call a few friends from amongst that community, they wouldn't end it despite seeing the same problems.
For all your high handed bull shit you and I are going to do precisely the same for the Uyghurs. What you can do is find a tool to leave your small world behind.
Because there is a world of grey.
As always the goal is to learn.
On the Amish, the point is both communities on whatever scale abuse those beneath them. Statistically you probably are in a demographic area to actually impact the Amish, but aren't of China. But you're twice as bent out of shape on scope as where you could actually fix a similar problem for voiceless individuals.
I don't forgive the abusers, but the idea that a modeled federated system is both in their ideology and model of the fediverse means they have a pretty clear idea of it. I come from the era where the biggest problem was death by committee and they'll know it well. How are they going to tackle the explosion of federators?
The point to a pluralist society is being able to have a dialogue. Because someone had the best idea for everything even if they were an idiot about everything else.