annegreen

joined 1 year ago
[–] annegreen@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a bit of a strange question, because an amendment is just that - an amendment. You don’t list amendments in your first draft of a constitution, you list articles. Amendments are changes made to the constitution after it’s ratified.

[–] annegreen@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Not always, but often, making unpopular changes is precisely what the executive is being paid to do. Their job is to implement these changes, make sure that they are the one everyone gets upset with, and then take that anger with them when they leave.

[–] annegreen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

This is definitely the most reasonable approach.

[–] annegreen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Aye, aye, captain.

[–] annegreen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Though OP never actually stated that the machine can perfectly predict the future. If that’s the case, then yes, you should just take box B. But we’re not given any information about how it makes its prediction. If @Sordid@sh.itjust.works is correct in assuming it’s a 50-50, then their strategy of taking both is best. It really depends on how the machine makes its prediction.

 

The second campaign I ever ran was the Lost Mine of Phandelver (the first campaign was a homebrew that lasted exactly half a session and ended in a TPK). At the time, I was but a foolish DM who was still trying to remember the difference between an attack roll and a damage roll, gave players far too many actions during their turns, and played with awful homebrew like crit tables.

My party had made it to the ruined village of Thundertree. After the rogue snuck through some ~~bushes~~ twig blights and died, I had to introduce a Druid character to cast reincarnation on him so that we could keep momentum going.

As the Druid was bringing the rogue back to life, the monk decided to explore the village some more. He enters an abandoned home.

You look around you and see furniture weathered and worn, strewn about the room. Plants are growing up from cracks in the floor. There’s nothing of interest here.

The monk decided to climb onto the roof. With a great acrobatics skill, that’s easy. He asks to roll a perception check.

You see the decimated village of Thundertree all around you. Most of the buildings are falling apart. The only building that looks to be in moderate repair is a tower on a hill.

“What else do I see in the distance?”

Umm, let me check a map… Well, the town is surrounded by neverwinter wood. It’s autumn, so the leaves are an array of red, gold, and orange. You can see a river winding through the woods, and near the horizon where it enters the sea, with the city of neverwinter sparkling like a jewel in the setting sun.

“I take 5 turns to admire the view.”

You pause and appreciate your surroundings, letting yourself burn this image of beauty into your memory. Now what?

“I jump down into the bushes below.”

As you descend, you realize these are not bushes, but twig blights. They attack you - and get a critical hit! Let me roll on the crit table to see what happens to you.

They’ve gouged out your eyes.

You are now blind.

Well at least the last thing you did with your sight was admire a scenic landscape.

That was the day we stopped using crit tables.

[–] annegreen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ll sometimes experience this, but it’s inconsistent. Other times I’ll be able to scroll as normal.

[–] annegreen@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I agree that we shouldn’t assume corruption if TheDude starts receiving any funds, but I think it would be beneficial to have clear expectations about how donations are being used. If it’s clear that excess funds go straight into TheDude’s pockets, great. Let anyone who wants to donate go for it. But I wouldn’t want anyone to donate thinking that they’re supporting server costs when they’re actually just tipping someone. Whichever way it goes, it just needs to be clear.

1
[Vote] Post Formats (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by annegreen@sh.itjust.works to c/agora@sh.itjust.works
 

My understanding is that it’s not currently possibly to flair posts on Lemmy. However, I want to suggest that we establish some basic etiquette/format for posts, such as beginning a title with [Vote], [Discussion], [Poll], [Question], or something similar. I believe that this could help clarify content. This etiquette could be outlined in the sidebar.

In favour, reply: “Aye”

Against, reply: “Nay”

ETA: This would apply only to the Agora, not across the entire instance. Additionally, these would be superseded by flairs if and when that becomes a possibility.

[–] annegreen@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think the biggest reason in favour of doing so would be that this would provide oversight and accountability for donations. I for one don’t feel entirely comfortable donating when I don’t know how the funds will be used.

Another potential reason would be to have multiple levels of democratized power. For instance, guests of the Agora might have no decision-making power, users some decision-making power, and members (having paid a one-time membership fee) some more decision-making power. Of course, that kind of structure assumes a decently large scale of organization.

If it comes to incorporating as a not-for-profit, I’ve got some experience with not-for-profits, and would be open to helping incorporate.