At least it's hypothetically possible to create with less net carbon impact than fossil fuels. It still has a long way to go, but we've got to invest in things that aren't practical right now if we ever want aviation to decarbonize.
ViciousTangerine
joined 11 months ago
Well, tankies are pretty good at eating their own, even when they agree on 99% of stuff.
This comment is the perfect example of how everything goes to shit in this world. It should be in a museum.
To build on this, the oceans absorb carbon from the air. As we remove CO2 from the ocean that differential becomes higher and more CO2 comes out of the air.
Will be funny to watch him crumble at the first moderately critical question
In the 21st century, there will be wars to give Toledo to other states.
Yeah, you're doing a terrible job. I heard the party you're supposed to be running has never won an election.
Could we stop creating chemicals and dumping them everywhere without knowing what they do? Or at least only use ones that break down relatively quickly instead of becoming ubiquitous in the air and water before we realize they're terrible for us...
I, for one, am absolutely boggled right now
Remove the subsidies and institute an actual carbon price mechanism, and we'll see how quickly people begin to switch over.
view more: next ›
Why is anyone still on there?