UlrikHD

joined 1 year ago
[–] UlrikHD@programming.dev 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Nothing you said other than expenses is an argument against nuclear. If anything, the take from you argument is that we should construct even more nuclear, not less.

[–] UlrikHD@programming.dev 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It'd honestly the funniest thing I've read on this instance. Puts programmer humour to shame. Love it when developers finds the jankiest/unconventional way to solve problems.

[–] UlrikHD@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You genuinely think it's faster to make a Web query, wait for search results to show up, click and wait for the correct webpage to load, navigate to the download page, download the exe, run the exe and go through the pop up menu than it is to type apt install x?

[–] UlrikHD@programming.dev 30 points 1 year ago (10 children)

If you care about energy density, nuclear is the best solution, not coal. I guess Germans don't care though

[–] UlrikHD@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Clean code would have indentation though, and you can use whatever space you want as indentation. Bonus points if you use tabs so that others with special needs can configure the tab length on their end.

And I don't think I've encountered an indentation error since the day I learned the language. How often do you encounter that error when writing python scripts? Sounds more like a theoretical problem than something anyone used to python would encounter.

[–] UlrikHD@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've never understood the complaint about forced indentation. What kind of monster doesn't use indentation for their code anyway?

If anything, it's nice that the language forces it on you so that you don't stumble on code written by one of those monsters.

[–] UlrikHD@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

For modding, it's very useful to not have everything statically linked. DLSS swapping is probably the most prominent use case nowadays.

[–] UlrikHD@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

You can just run the code in the debugger to see if it does what you expect.

[–] UlrikHD@programming.dev 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's uses safari's engine, which is the only one allowed by Apple. Doesn't matter what browser you download from the store.

[–] UlrikHD@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, it's probably cheaper than than counting the number of comments since a timestamp though. Pure conjecture on my part though, haven't really done much stuff with SQL.

[–] UlrikHD@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

comment_count - old_count after a moderator deleted some comments would be my bet.

[–] UlrikHD@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

It would be terrible if you want to be serious about it. There is a ton of great information that would be lost if it happened.

view more: ‹ prev next ›