Stoneykins

joined 1 year ago
[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Salad theory is rigid and respectable.

Cube rule of food identification exists to be disproven aggressively for comedy and arguing. It's a good time, until the person that believes it so truly they would kill and die to call a cheese roll up sushi arrives. They can make the conversation stressful.

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Names of things don't have to follow "the rules of english" to change and morph with who is using them.

Acting like there is any immutable qualities to any language or word is kinda silly.

Currently, with the common opinion split pretty well, the correct answer for how to say it is "'gif' or 'jif'". Call it whichever you want.

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 21 points 10 months ago

Yes take this down

Do not post their content, reuse it to make memes, or talk about them any more than is necessary to make clear how they are not to be platformed. They thrive on negative attention and should simply be ignored.

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 58 points 10 months ago (4 children)

This image of a cube conveys an emotion I do not know the word for.

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Thanks for this recommendation, will be checking out Thought slime

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Why anyone would do proper seatbelting "preventatively" when you have airbags and your car is built with crumple zones and just a low level general risk of getting in what is mostly a fender bender is honestly crazy to me. We now understand how collisions work, where they happen, how to build cars safer (ie with more airbags). There's no reason to remain so scared anymore.

Edit for context: I don't literally think this, I was mocking something from the removed comment

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"fabric" is a generic term and what I used to include all masks, including n95s. Also, you don't understand risk reduction.

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 33 points 10 months ago (11 children)

I can't believe people still act like putting a tiny piece of fabric on your face is even an inconvenience. So fucking dramatic "I can't imagine living like this" its like living a regular life except sometimes you go an public and you put a little piece of fabric on your face. It's similar in concept in some ways to how when you go in public you use pieces of fabric to cover your genitals, etc. oh man what a crazy fucking bizarro world can't even imagine if we had to put fabric on parts of us when interacting in public.

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Apple is interested in maintaining full control of what apps can be on their platform and how they are presented because it gives them power over negotiations with companies that build the apps. They are basically able to "name their price" and make sure they are always getting as big of a cut as they would like.

The EU is interested in not letting them do that because that kind of "negotiating" behavior is pretty well understood to be anti-consumer. Increased costs for app developers are usually passed directly onto the consumer through the prices. And it tends to get worse over time.

No company anywhere wants to use webapps anymore. Apps installed on devices are free advertising and access to user data. It is frustrating but the way it is, on all devices, already. So basically the answer is the same as why can't most apps that already exist on all devices anyways just be web apps.

I don't think sideloaded would be quite the right word, this is about access to other app stores (like the google play store or amazon app store, or more niche ones) that would then formally and automatically install and maintain apps exactly the same way the apple app store already does, presumably just with a different library of apps to choose from.

Apps from another app store would need no access to any API by apple unless they were specifically interacting with apple services, AFAIK. Which, would be under the full control of apple and apple chooses who uses it, how, and how much they use it, but that is already the case regardless.

I tried to answer your confusions as best as I can do with what I know already. As for why people take this so personally, I would say it is a complex topic combining businesses that are constantly trying to drive each other out of business with the social effects of making the tool people use to communicate a status symbol. And it has been brewing for long enough that people are getting extreme opinions and fostering long term grudges based on personal experience, to the point that some people have some real hatred towards anyone who has a different phone OS than them.

This was a long comment to type and I did it while laying in bed half asleep. Sorry if it has a bunch of typos or errors lol

view more: ‹ prev next ›