'Apple is one of the better option privacy wise'
You're right in the semantics there, as a whole I can't say many AI companies are net positive, but that's exactly why they have the money to spend on marketing - its really all they got
Yeah but honestly without implementing 'one true philosophy' I can't see any ground to stand on where they shouldn't be allowed to.
What if god comes down tomorrow and says 'the fuck you guys are keeping babies instead of killing them?!?'
To us we really got no frame of reference of an absolute 'good faith' or bad, so enforcing it just seems like encouraging abuse of the system.
It's to me intentional misdirection via generality I suppose.
Which I'd attribute to malice considering the amount of money its currently making
Fun analogy but uh that's not all that scientific my guy.
Give me 5 min and I'll draw communism as Chad then you'll be fucked
I think its more the case that its too general, ie 'all humans that died have drank water' type of vibe, except in this case people start thinking their AI is gonna mold with alien technology and have sex with a super hero a-la Jarvis
Literally what half the comments here are saying lmao, like yes and the sky is green everyone knows this
I mean most houses crumble when you hit em with a tornado but were still building houses.
What i mean to say is I think we can agree there's enough noise in most previous communism attempts, making them pretty shitty data to base your hypothesis off off
Sounds like games on whales was nearly made for you.
If you're wired on both ends, its essentially unnoticeable
Pretty sure I remember that too, but believe there was some caveat like it only uploads when watching, making made it 'more give less take' on average
See sending ip packets is quite a lot easier that sending pig fetuses