Prunebutt

I don't like you assuming my gender, homie.

I'd like for people not lying about shit they said.

Edit: so you think that shit went puplic 4 years ago and didn't even work back then would work now, when everybody knows he already tried to pull that shit?

I don't understand how the software sourcecode having leaked means that machines have been compromized. That only means thatecurity through obscurity policies won't work anymore. But that's a horrible policy.

Edit your comment. I don't understand squat.

I get that you don't like edits, but you should get into that because you make a lot of mistakes with what you write.

Wrong. I edit all the time, since I make typos a lot. What I don't like is backpedaling liars.

I use speech to text and then edit manually.

Then edit them before you hit send. 🙄

doesn't change the facts Jack.

Don't call me Jack.

made up your little stories.

What did I make up?

I edited my comments before you asked me

That's a horrible way to write on lemmy.

you can scroll up and try reading for a change.

I read your comments. It's not on me to check every minute wether or not you edited them since then.

also stop talking about 2000

You brought it up, smartass.

the guy was right about the 2004 election

Sure he was. /s

(that's another edit I made again before you asked me the question).

If you write shit you didn't want to and I reference what you wrote first, that's on you, not me.

because she isn't calling for a recount

wrong again. From the transcript:

Over the coming months, officials in every county will be certifying that the election was fair. Or as “fair” as our elections get these days. If that includes some hand-counting of ballots, I’m all for it. If someone wants to file a lawsuit to force the hand-counting of ballots, I’m all for that, too. Election transparency is good, even if it tells us something we desperately do not want to hear: that Donald Trump won the 2024 election.

and just accept this possible conspiracy even though we all know that conservatives perpetrated a similar conspiracy for years ago.

Where does she claim that? I'd like a quote.

Don't call me Jack.

yeah dude, i didn't answer you before you asked a question.

1. I am not your dude. Don't call me that.
2. "I literally addresses that" implies that I ignored your other comment... before it existed...

concrete facts

lol

I've never necountered the term before. But your delusional, lying style is exactly how I would picture democrat simps who drink a Qanon style kool-aid

You are quite a good example of a blueAnon user. Have fun in your fantasy world where everyone but you is stupid and right wing.

The guy was right before, we should do a recount, she just wants to pretend that "conspiracies" aren't real despite the elector fraud scheme that happened 4 years ago.

That's not what she said. You can read it up in the transcript.

Need I go on? This “lifelong Republican,” (as he stated in his letter to Kamala Harris) has previously campaigned to reverse the 2004 election in which George W. Bush beat John Kerry–the year Bush won even the popular vote, by the way, not the year he actually stole the election in Florida.

He never questioned the 2000 election. She agrees that that one might have been stolen, but the dude claimed that 2004 was stolen. Not 2000.

So, what did you edit your comments for, if not for editing you calling her "right wing". I can't prove it, because lemmy doesn't preserve edit history, but you called her right wing twice, then edited them, then called me a liar for referencing that.

So, why did you edit your posts? Why are you claiming pi-oting on what the video says? How is it defeatist, if it actually agrees with your points?

What did you edit your comment for, then. You called her right wing twice and then edited it to say first "lying", then "defeatist".

how I referenced all of her points

What? When? Where?

that they matched up with exactly what I said and what the article says.

Lol, sure. /s

So you don't even admit that you called her right wing?

I literally addressed her points in the other comment.

You didn't at the time I wrote the other comment. Again: wtf are you trying to pull off, lying and shit?

she basically agrees with me. the guy was right before 2000, we know that Republicans do steal elections and try to steal one 4 years ago, so we should do recounts this time.

No, she doesn't. He didn't claim anything like that in 2000. From the transcript:

Need I go on? This “lifelong Republican,” (as he stated in his letter to Kamala Harris) has previously campaigned to reverse the 2004 election in which George W. Bush beat John Kerry–the year Bush won even the popular vote, by the way, not the year he actually stole the election in Florida.

you didn't watch her video did you?

First, you call her right wing, then you claim that she's lying, then you claim that she agrees with you by misquoting her. Pathetic.

Yeah. and then you acted as if you never called her right-wing.