Prunebutt

joined 10 months ago
[–] Prunebutt 1 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

yeah dude, i didn't answer you before you asked a question.

  1. I am not your dude. Don't call me that.
  2. "I literally addresses that" implies that I ignored your other comment... before it existed...
[–] Prunebutt 1 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

concrete facts

lol

I've never necountered the term before. But your delusional, lying style is exactly how I would picture democrat simps who drink a Qanon style kool-aid

[–] Prunebutt 2 points 9 hours ago (9 children)

You are quite a good example of a blueAnon user. Have fun in your fantasy world where everyone but you is stupid and right wing.

[–] Prunebutt 3 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

The guy was right before, we should do a recount, she just wants to pretend that "conspiracies" aren't real despite the elector fraud scheme that happened 4 years ago.

That's not what she said. You can read it up in the transcript.

Need I go on? This “lifelong Republican,” (as he stated in his letter to Kamala Harris) has previously campaigned to reverse the 2004 election in which George W. Bush beat John Kerry–the year Bush won even the popular vote, by the way, not the year he actually stole the election in Florida.

He never questioned the 2000 election. She agrees that that one might have been stolen, but the dude claimed that 2004 was stolen. Not 2000.

So, what did you edit your comments for, if not for editing you calling her "right wing". I can't prove it, because lemmy doesn't preserve edit history, but you called her right wing twice, then edited them, then called me a liar for referencing that.

So, why did you edit your posts? Why are you claiming pi-oting on what the video says? How is it defeatist, if it actually agrees with your points?

[–] Prunebutt 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (11 children)

What did you edit your comment for, then. You called her right wing twice and then edited it to say first "lying", then "defeatist".

[–] Prunebutt 4 points 9 hours ago (9 children)

how I referenced all of her points

What? When? Where?

that they matched up with exactly what I said and what the article says.

Lol, sure. /s

[–] Prunebutt 1 points 9 hours ago (13 children)

So you don't even admit that you called her right wing?

[–] Prunebutt 2 points 9 hours ago (9 children)

I literally addressed her points in the other comment.

You didn't at the time I wrote the other comment. Again: wtf are you trying to pull off, lying and shit?

she basically agrees with me. the guy was right before 2000, we know that Republicans do steal elections and try to steal one 4 years ago, so we should do recounts this time.

No, she doesn't. He didn't claim anything like that in 2000. From the transcript:

Need I go on? This “lifelong Republican,” (as he stated in his letter to Kamala Harris) has previously campaigned to reverse the 2004 election in which George W. Bush beat John Kerry–the year Bush won even the popular vote, by the way, not the year he actually stole the election in Florida.

you didn't watch her video did you?

First, you call her right wing, then you claim that she's lying, then you claim that she agrees with you by misquoting her. Pathetic.

[–] Prunebutt 1 points 9 hours ago (15 children)

Yeah. and then you acted as if you never called her right-wing.

[–] Prunebutt 8 points 10 hours ago (12 children)

her conclusion is, "that guy was right before, the Republicans did steal the election in 2000, but maybe he isn't correct this time?"

lol, nope. Not what she said in the video. That guy didn't complain in 2000. He did so in 2004, though.

You didn't watch it.

[–] Prunebutt 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (11 children)

have fun making things up.

Says the person whose primary source pretty much only writes in conditionals and calls them "facts".

If you watched it so often, why don't you address her points, then?

[–] Prunebutt 1 points 10 hours ago (17 children)

You claimed she was right wing and then edited your comment. What the fuck are you trying to pull off here.

 
39
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Prunebutt to c/europe@feddit.org
 
 
 

Deutsche Version. Cross-postet von !europe@feddit.de

Der belgische Vorsitz im Rat der EU will die Chatkontrolle am Mittwoch den 19. Juni abstimmen lassen. Damit bestätigen sich die Befürchtungen: die Verfechter der Chatkontrolle wollen ausnutzen, dass es nach den Wahlen weniger öffentliche Aufmerksamkeit gibt, während sich das Europäische Parlament erst neu bilden muss. Wenn die Chatkontrolle es jetzt durch den Rat schafft besteht außerdem die Gefahr, dass sich das Parlament in seiner neuen Zusammensetzung nicht so stark gegen die Chatkontrolle wehrt und unsere bisherigen Erfolge in den Trilogverhandlungen zwischen Rat und Parlament wieder aufgibt. [...]

165
ich✊iel (slrpnk.net)
 

Geht in Gewerkschaften! Tretet Mietybündnissen bei! Macht den Konserven/Nazis das Leben zur Hölle!

11
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Prunebutt to c/breadtube
 

Edit - Addendum: The video title is quite clickbait-y. The video doesn't want to debunk any "serious" science, but rather investigates how badly done research with no reproducability or horrible statistical significance is used to influence the discourse in favour of regressive politics.

 

John Lee Hooker's Boom Boom was in the same movie. I first thought that it played right before Shake a tail feather, but I think that was actually right before Aretha Franklin's "Think". Still, there's the connection.

949
submitted 7 months ago by Prunebutt to c/memes
 

Oldie but goodie.

Transcript: Tweet by the SRSLY wrong podcast. Content: "message to my enemies: when the revolution comes you're not just gonna get the wall, buddy, you're gonna get four walls, a roof, clean clothes, good food, education, and quality health care because that's what every human being alive deserves"

 

Eine sehr schöne Podcastfolge über CanG und Drogenpolitik im Allgemeinen.

view more: ‹ prev next ›