OhNoMoreLemmy

joined 1 year ago
[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 83 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I remember playing Max Payne. There was some battle in a bar against a guy with a shotgun. If you timed it right between reloads you could run up to the guy, stand on the bar so your guns were exactly level with his face and empty two Uzi clips point blank into his face before he could reload.

Then you would run out of ammo and he would one shot kill you.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

It really comes down to what you're used to. If you use Windows tools then you already know many of the workarounds for Windows and you don't know the tools that haven't been ported there.

For example, you know not to use Python directly, but that you have to install anaconda instead, or whatever the current problems with Python development on Windows are.

The big obvious thing that you can't get away from is that you have to do things differently if you have develop for two different OSs with a view to deploying on Linux.

In particular support for shell scripts is crap on Windows. I could learn powershell or there's workarounds using WSL and a bunch of other stuff that I don't need to care about, but I'd rather not bother.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I mean coding is difficult enough as it is, I wouldn't choose to use an OS that makes it even harder.

I use Linux because it makes my life easier. It has better support for development. Some of the other stuff is maybe not as easy or polished, but the support for dev tools and the ease of deploying to from local machines to servers that are also running Linux makes up for it.

If I wanted more effort I'd still be using Windows. It would force me to work on cross platform development and deployment. The idea that there's value in making things unnecessarily hard is just weird. I want Linux to be as simple as possible to use, so I can spend that effort on things that actually matter.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Fine for me on 0.2.0.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Although it's federated nature is kinda dying.

If you're not on one of the major providers good luck getting people to see your email.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 weeks ago

I'm still hoping this happens and leads to a WWE style outcome.

Elon has a heart attack on the ring and falls on top of Zuck pinning and smothering him. Zuck is forced to tap and Elon is stretchered out the ring

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

You can't do that because he's a billionaire.

For billionaires you have to charge them at least a few hundred thousand to be sunk to the bottom of the ocean in a small but very exclusive carbon fiber chamber.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It just says can be activated. Not "automatically activates".

Kill switches are overly dramatic silliness. Anything with a power button has a kill switch. It sounds impressive but it's just theatre.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

You ~~err'd~~ fucked-up twice.

Once when you flat out failed to find anything using Google, when other people clearly had no trouble at all. If you're telling the truth, this just means you suck at Google. There's no reason to be googling chatgpt's hallucinations instead of searching for the stuff an actual human told you about.

The second time was when you took chatgpt seriously. Just don't. It's a very expensive toy that occasionally does something cool. We're still trying to figure out if it's actually useful for anything, or if it's just really good at appearing useful.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Google returns sources that you can evaluate for accuracy.

Chatgpt just says things.

Every output of chatgpt should end with "source: just trust me bro".

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

My hope is that the AI safety bills end up being so broad that we can sue Microsoft for some of the global warming caused when trying to train these models.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah you're right. Too many negatives and I flipped one of them when thinking about this.

view more: ‹ prev next ›