Lath

I don't think it's intentional, more like incompetent.
The training uses data that exists and the people most active in the online medium are.. misogynist men who don't really interact with women outside of this medium. Sad state of affairs but it is the preferred form of escape from reality.
So the data used is flawed from the start, but a money-driven culture means the owners don't care what content is added as long as it generates them means of making a profit.

Correct me if I'm wrong because I'm ok with that. Maybe.

Tea parties are awesome.
I remember one time, there were these sweet cookies made out of fat and flour and I ate a lot of them. Two hours later I vomited like crazy because of the fat.
Another time, instead of tea and those cookies, it was milk and jam. Same thing really, different flavours. Also the vomit was more pleasant to look at.
There wasn't an another time after that. I still wonder why sometimes...

It definitely will. Past CSAM spam used abandoned or ignored instances to smuggle into the larger ones.
When you build something yourself, you also become responsible for what goes through it.

You really don't know much about HP goblins, do you?
They aren't just there to look funny. They hold the wizards bank because they're master craftsmen. They're defeated rivals who still rebel from time to time whenever able to. They can use magic just as well as wizards if not better and were banned from using wands as a matter of status, something they didn't much care for anyway because they prefer using violence in combat over magic. The half-goblin professor is a master duelist and attributes part of that to his aggressive goblin blood.
That's just basic stuff you learn from the movies.

Sure, the exposition is poor, but it makes sense considering it's being done from the perspective of wizards.

look at the funny little greedy men with big noses, aren’t they annoying and mean, haha?

That's exactly how the wizards see them. Bravo to the directors for instilling that notion so well in the viewers. It means they did their job well in this regard.

You say the protagonists in Star Trek had a system of values they respected, but didn't they also have to respect the culture of other species? To impose their own views and values on another was also considered self-serving and foolish.

Also the human civilization was post-enlightenment. Is the wizard society in HP also enlightened? Not really. Rowling calls them backwards, centuries behind the rest of civilization.
How were we a century ago, let alone two?

This is why I said similar. Circumstances are different. The world, the lore, the setting.
The goblins were given a foundation and it was built on in accordance with the rest of the world it was in. With the type of background the story portrayed. In line with every other exposition of that world.

In the first movie they were there to scare a newcomer, but it also showed they took their role in that bank seriously. And with each movie beyond that, more and more was uncovered of their culture, their history and their way of life. To anyone who cared to look at least.
Goblins didn't just remain funny little greedy men with big noses until the end, but at the same time they also didn't change much of their culture. And neither did the wizards. Only a little. A small step forward. Together. Because they're long-lived, don't like each other all that much and change is slow.

The point of dating is having it as an option for people who like dating.

The point of love is having someone who will care for you relatively as much as you care for them.
That person doesn't have to be the opposite sex.

You people have grass where you are? I only have some mushy dirt and some crumbly sticks that I believe to be dried cat poop.

Age of Mythology

The point we're dancing around is whether to boycott a work of fiction due to its use of uncomfortable topics and under which circumstances.
The comparison between Harry Potter and Star Trek is that both had persons in charge that are considered to have or have had extreme views in regards to those topics.

The views on Ferengi traditions were within the lore of its fictional universe. The practices outside of it were very much not in line with those same beliefs at the time.

And we're remembering different things. The practice was not outdated, but very much in use within the Ferengi core space. Even at the end it became a tradition that could be practiced freely, not eliminated completely. And not because of morals, but because of profit.

I'll concede on Troi's mother because I'm vague on the details of her circumstances.

The core idea remains. Women treated poorly on one side, Jewish people treated poorly on the other. One side praised, the other shunned. Both in the same place.

Note that I am treating the HP goblins and jews as different entities. I never saw them as synonymous. The goblins' culture in the story was theirs and theirs alone and you won't get me to see otherwise because that's what it is to me, a story.

That being said, if we attribute goblins as representative to Jewish people, then we should do the same over the entire series. Which culture do the wizards represent? The giants? The werewolves? The mer people? Pure bloods? Mudbloods?

Every other representative is ignored. The portrayal of society is ignored. The goblins are pulled out of that story and their role within, put under a spotlight and given a sign saying "pity us".
Because the Jewish were marginalized? They were. Many times, in many countries. Across many centuries.
This isn't antisemitism, it's fact of history. Don't like history? Too bad, it still happened.

Have you actually seen the movies or read the books? Rowling ridicules wizard society. Who does that society represent I wonder? And in what context?

Extract the Jewish from the goblins, then extract the society that treats them poorly. Is it still antisemitism or is it a reflection of reality at one point?

First of all, as a time honored tradition it is customary to say this: Never, ever trust an autosave. Manual saves and backup, always.

With that out of the way, yeah, libre office is kinda bad at the regular user stuff. If you aren't a fiddler who goes through options first and sets their own personal preferences, a bad time will be had.

Also, apparently crashes might reset the auto save tick depending on the version used, so check twice if it happens again just to make sure.

Ps: Never had an issue with it personally, but it's hit or miss with its users.

Pazaak!

Dunno, maybe collect the news of every private digital data leak in recent years and show how unsafe it really is?