Hjalamanger

joined 11 months ago
[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 3 points 5 days ago

Can I get a conversation table?

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's true but (at least here in Sweden and among my friends and classmates) I think most people read at least occasionally. Personally, however I'm in the +10 category by a long shot

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 15 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

I doubt the accuracy of this map. I have never seen a dominos in Sweden and I've seen a few dunkin donuts so the map is, at least not fully accurate. Also didn't McDonald's shut down in Russia?

Could you please post a source for this map?

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 4 points 2 weeks ago

Don't you guys not Kung fu fight on boats in the ocean??? I thought everyone did that!

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 2 points 2 weeks ago

nice game! although I feel like some of the setups in tumbling ballistic are impossible to beat, although there just random. Anyways, here's my very messy code:

// Arguments:
let {x_position, altitude, angle, userStore} = arguments[0];

let target_angle = 0
let x_thrust = 0

///////////////
// Side slip //
///////////////

let half = 159
let ms = 400
let target_speed = ((half - x_position) / half) * ms

if (altitude < 150 || target_speed < 0.1 * ms)
  target_speed = 0

if (!("px" in userStore)) {
  userStore.px = x_position
}
let dx = userStore.px - x_position
userStore.px = x_position
let xs = dx * 60 + target_speed
let axs = xs > 0 ? xs : -xs

target_angle = axs < 90 ? xs : 90 * (xs / axs)
x_thrust = (axs / 90) * (target_angle  > 0 ? target_angle : -target_angle) * 1
if (x_thrust > 1) {
  x_thrust = 1
}
x_thrust = x_thrust * ((target_angle  > 0 ? target_angle : -target_angle) / 90)

let atas = altitude < 150 ? altitude / 150 : 1
target_angle *= atas

let ad = target_angle - angle
let aad = ad > 0 ? ad : -ad

let aa = angle > 0 ? angle : -angle

let xtc90 = altitude < 500 ? (altitude / 500) * 30 : 30

if (aa > 90 + xtc90 || aad > 45 || altitude < 200) {
  x_thrust = 0
}

//////////////
// Altitude //
//////////////

if (!("da" in userStore)) {
  userStore.da = 0;
}
if (!("pa" in userStore)) {
  userStore.pa = altitude;
}

userStore.da = userStore.pa - altitude
userStore.pa = altitude
let as = userStore.da * 60

let tas = altitude / 1.35 + 0.2
let thrust = 0
if (as > tas) {
  thrust = 1
}
let acb = 200 + (as > 250 ? 100 : 0)
let angle_cutoff = altitude < acb ? 89 * (as / 200) : 35
if (angle_cutoff > 89) angle_cutoff = 89
if ((angle > 0 ? angle : -angle) > angle_cutoff) {
  thrust = 0
}

thrust += x_thrust
if (thrust > 1) {
  thrust = 1
}

//////////////
// Rotation //
//////////////

if (!("dr" in userStore)) {
  userStore.dr = 0;
}
if (!("pr" in userStore)) {
  userStore.pr = angle;
}

userStore.dr = userStore.pr - angle
userStore.pr = angle
let rs = userStore.dr * 60
let ars = rs > 0 ? rs : -rs
let rsrtm = 0.02
let rt = (-(angle - target_angle) / 360) * 10 + rs * rsrtm

let ardmc = 50
if (ars < 30) ardmc = 0

let rd = angle - target_angle
let ard = (rd > 0 ? rs : -rd) + rs * ardmc

let ard180_1 = 180 - (angle > 0 ? angle : -angle)
let ard180_2 = 180 - (target_angle > 0 ? target_angle : -target_angle)
let ard180 = ard180_1 + ard180_2 - rs * ardmc

if (((target_angle > 0) != (angle > 0)) && ard180 < ard && false) {
  rt -= rs * rsrtm
  rt = -rt 
}

if (rt > 1) rt = 1;
else if (rt < -1) rt = -1;

// Return:
return { rotThrust:rt, aftThrust:thrust,userStore:userStore };
[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 7 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

What in the whole dam world is linex forte stabilni slozeni 2?

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's extremely noticeable with left handed people trying to draw on whiteboards

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 3 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know, but I would've think so. Part of the reason is that almost no one actually learns to read this stuff fluently without using the key and going letter by letter. So getting any significant sample of people to test it on would probably be hard

I can't read (or write) it without the key, however I'm quite fast if I get to do it. I have thought of trying to learn it completely, mainly to see how hard it would be and what I'd learn (apart from, you know, learning brädgårdschiffer) from learning a "new" alfabet. I'd be interested to see how I view it in comparison to regular Latin script. I speak somewhere between 2 and 4 languages depending on how you count and I've found every new one interesting and insightful to learn so it would be fun to see if learning to read a new script fluently would be anywhere near as insightful. Ultimately I'd like to learn Korean or Chinese but that be a major challenge and take a lot of time (also, I could probably not squeeze it in to my formal education with the path I'm going to take so I'd have to do it in my free time)

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, sure you can just substitute out the letters or write them out as is. And thanks for the image, i always get problems with images proxyed through ddg and then my instance

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Does one two one representations of the Latin alfabet count? In such case I'd mention a cipher used in Sweden called "brädgårdschiffer". Here is "hej på dig!" written using brädgårdschiffer with my very sloppy writing on my phone:

Hej på dig!

It's decrypted by matching up the shape and amount of dots with the letters in the key below. You look at the edges around the letters and the dots above that square.

key for brädgårdschiffer. This image is broken (: Link

I do however think that this chiffer probably exists outside of Sweden under some other name and other letters included (note that W and Q aren't included in the key. They aren't really used for in Swedish, apart from loans from other languages)

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Whilst of course unlikely it might be possible if you accept that the women is around 34 year's old. Then she gave birth to her daughter at 15 and that's not common but also not impossible (I've meet a kid to a mother who's fifteen years older then her kid)

But in the end this is probably just made up, so what gives?

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 6 points 1 month ago

Lego figures would love this

23
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Hjalamanger@feddit.nu to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
 

We have basic words for the numbers zero to three, so why not use them to count?

  • None (0)
  • Single (1)
  • pair (2)
  • Multiple (3+ but we'll use it as three)

So with those "digits" we can construct some numbers:

  1. Single
  2. pair
  3. Multiple
  4. Single nothing
  5. Single single
  6. Single pair
  7. Single multiple
  8. Pair of nothing
  9. Pair of singels
  10. Pair of pairs

And of course we can construct bigger numbers like:
42 = 4²×2+4¹×2+4⁰×2 = pair of pairs of pairs
128 = 4³×2 = pair of absolute complete nothinges For this last one I just use some adjectives to repeat the "nothing" as it looks really weird with multiple nothing in a row.

The distance between Stockholm and Gothenburg is a single multiple of none multiple multiples

Could I have a single multiple of bananas please?

 

I saw this on the street today and found it very funny

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

And do believe that I, this random guy on the internet has a soul

I personally don't believe that I anyone else has a soul. From my standup I don't se any reason to believe that our consciousness and our so called "soul" would be any more then something our brain is making up.

 

Like just commenting a friendly joke, a compliment or something like that

 
view more: next ›