G4Z

joined 1 year ago
[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

They are a crime family.

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Labour’s 100% track record at making the country better over

Sorry but, I actually remember the Labour years and this is massively over simplifying.

They actually encouraged and made worse a lot of problems we are dealing with now, things like housing and starting an illegal war.

That aside, we are talking about a different labour to the one from 15+ years ago and the things Keir is saying are not very encouraging and I don't support a party, I vote for policy so that's why I take a dim view of what I'm hearing.

Might they be marginally better, maybe, I used to believe that but I'm sorry he's lost me. I know you and Kier will say that the proof is in the polling, and that might be true but I think with how god-awful this last decade has been it should be even better than that.

I am sick to fuck of pandering to old boomer fucks in marginal constituencies. You probably got that tho right?

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Pollster and focus group? I've not seen any such evidence.

It seems my guess is as good as any bodies really, and I can certainly imagine there are others who are revolted by the way Labour has been going on.

Fair point about Davey, and in fairness I've no idea what they are even about now they are so irrelevant.

I’m going to vote for the party that always makes the country better

I'd like to believe Labour will do that, I just don't.

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

That sub is shite.

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

We should just take it, it was taken in the first place by force.

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

I knew it was going to be that awful video.

Mate it's entirely and totally wrong, here's why

https://youtu.be/yiE2DLqJB8U

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I know some, they aren't all rich, some of them actually work for a living believe it or not.

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk -1 points 1 year ago (12 children)

We don't really know exactly why, we know the Tory candidate says it was ULEZ so I'm inclined to believe it was something else tbh with you.

Starmer is a low fat Tory, he's got no intention of reversing any of their shady policies, much less chance of improving things with a move to PR for example. I wanted him to begin with because I thought he might offer a backbone on Brexit but he;s been shite on that as well. I've given him a chance to see what he is, and I don't like it, he's shite. I'll vote LD tbh, because I'm in a safe seat anyway and I just can't bring myself to do it.

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

The Crown owns the Crown estates. It was never tax payer funded

The state (aka us) owns the crown, the crown is not owned by the monarch.

As for tax free. Since the US revolution. The Crown has given the income to the government.

You mean our assets have paid money to the monarchy as part of a centuries old deal to pay for the last Charlie boys debts. Fuck that, I don't see we have to keep one family in a state of perpetual luxury because of that.

Simple research into the history of the Crown estates makes it clear it dosenot in any way shape or form belong to the tax payer.

No, simple research shows that it does in fact belong to us. I'd love to see your source mate.

Can Charlie sell any of it? Can he put it in his will? Can he even make renovations? No, well he doesn't own it does he.

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Believe me, those voters exist.

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think anything they can't prove they earned, like with a p60 and a bank account trail they lose. Any money them simply made from owning shit, well, that's ours that is.

They can go on universal credit until they get jobs in Asda, if Asdas will take em.

view more: ‹ prev next ›