EvilTed

joined 9 months ago
[–] EvilTed@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Fibre is probably good for you, if you have a normal gut.

I've found that everyone's IBS is different and reacts differently to different foods or environmental factors such as stress. So generalisations are often a good place to start, if you're newly diagnosed, but over time you will learn what works for you. That said, it sounds like you've made good progress, so do what's right for you and your wellbeing.

Take from the following what you will.

I was diagnosed as a child, a very long time ago, with IBS-C and told to eat lots of fibre.

The problem is fibre draws water into the intestines which, in theory should make your stool easier to pass. Sounds great if you don't shit regularly.

However, if you have a constriction caused by a spasm/contraction of the muscles in your gut - the cramps- you just end up with a very large ball of indigestible fibre and water and shit being forced against the spasming muscles and lots of pain and bloating.

Eventually, the cramps relax and you get explosive diarrhea. Yay!

As a generalisation; I have heard from people with IBS-D that any fibre just causes irritation of their intestines and bowel and just more explosive shitting and cramps than normal.

Either way it seems like it should be avoided.

For what it's worth I found four things helpful for my IBS, lower my carb and sugar intake. Low fibre, dark chocolate and acupuncture.

The dark chocolate was a pure accidental discovery. I was being a pig many Christmases ago and ate a lot of dark chocolates in one sitting. The next day I had a normal dump. I connected the dots and as an ex-scientist I was interested so I did some reading and found dark chocolate contains a good dose of bioavailable magnesium. That gives me the benefit of fibre without the physical mass or irritation it causes. I tried magnesium supplements but they didn't have the same effect. I eat one small bar of 70-85% Coco solids a day. My wife, who has IBS-D, just gets the shits from eating it, which is perhaps not surprising.

[–] EvilTed@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Any other questions let me know πŸ‘

[–] EvilTed@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

No problem πŸ˜ƒ

None of the following is necessarily the right way to do this, it just works for me.

I use Fast Raw Viewer to cull my images from the card. It's very quick and has lots of useful tools for quickly analysing images and segregating them.

From there I store the images on my NAS.

I have various top level folders on the NAS by topic like holidays, portraits, wildlife, macro etc

Each top level folder will contain subfolders based on logical differentiators e.g wildlife--location, or Portraits --person

This makes it easy to find an image via folder navigation without going through lightroom.

For wildlife I visit the same places so i sequentially rename the new photos to continue from the last one in the sequence. E.g

Wildlife--Bempton--Bempton0000001.nef

I have one lightroom catalogue and I import the images into it from the folder.

I tag the images as I import them with useful tags. I have been meaning to add species to my wildlife images but that will take some weeks lol

Lightroom will let me find the images by folder or tag or exif data or date etc

I will score the images at this point which can help when searching.

Once imported I will select the ones I want to spend extra time on. Once any additional processing is done I might then use Topaz sharpen and denoise.

Lightroom's noise reduction has gotten very good lately so I don't tend to use denoise anymore.

If I want to print the image (rare) it will be on acrylic at 60x40cm so I might use Topaz gigapixel to upscale the image if it was a heavy crop.

I also use a screen calibration tool (Spyder) if I'm doing prints. Printing is a whole 'nother topic that I'm a complete amateur at.

I have Photoshop but I only use it for image stacking for macro and I'm sure you could get cheaper tools to do that with.

I hope that helps.

[–] EvilTed@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Thanks streetfestival 😊

97
A Woodland Nymph (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by EvilTed@lemmy.world to c/birding@lemmy.world
 

European Greenfinch (Chloris Chloris)

Cambridgeshire July 2019

Nikon D7200, Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6

f/6.3, 1/1000s, ISO 500, 500mm

After having a chat with @AchtungDrempels about Greenfinches, I trawled through my catalogue to see if I actually had any photos of one. It turns out I have four, which is remiss of me as they are beautiful birds.

In Greek mythology Chloris was a nymph associated with spring, flowers and new growth, it comes from the Greek word Khloros, meaning pale green. All of which seem apt for a green bird that I find mostly in woodlands and hedgerows.

They eat a wide range of fruits, seeds, flowers and some invertebrates, and I found this one on a bramble bush eating its flowers.

 

Hi

I'm seeing posts I have deleted appearing in my profile. Is there a way of hiding them if they can't be actually hard deleted?

Love the app by the way πŸ‘

[–] EvilTed@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There are many habitat restoration projects where I live. You can visit hundreds of hectares of fens and woodland within a few K's of my home, and many more are created each year. It's not all doom. I was a birdwatcher for decades before I picked up a camera to photograph wildlife. It was a way to remember some of the beautiful things I had seen, photography for me doesn't replace the bird watching, it's an addendum.

[–] EvilTed@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're doing very well with that setup, I am impressed πŸ‘ And thanks for the photo.

I love that feeder as well, a great idea πŸ˜€ I'm not sure I wouldn't just have a parakeet feeder if we got them regularly lol

[–] EvilTed@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I'll see if I can find one that is a better peach colour lol

[–] EvilTed@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

You're very welcome.

[–] EvilTed@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Thank you 😊

It was about this time I bought my Nikon D850 which, for many reasons, has much superior noise control than the Nikon D7200 I took this with. However, image processing technology has moved on so much that I find myself less concerned with noise now than ever before. I think, if I was taking this shot today, I would probably shoot at ISO 2000 on the D850 to give me the extra shutter speed. What I really need is f/4 500mm 😁

[–] EvilTed@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (6 children)

We get goldfinches but no chaffinches or greenfinches. I don't think there is enough woodland for them, mostly farmland, but there are a lot of teasles, which the goldfinches love for their seeds.

I would love to see any pictures you have of the greenfinches, they are such beautiful birds.

Glad you like it 😊

[–] EvilTed@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

There you go ☺️

118
Sundown (lemmy.world)
 

Male Eurasian Chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs)

Rutland Nature Reserve, November 2019.

Nikon D7200, Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6

f6.3, 1/40s, ISO 500, 380mm

Chaffinches are one of the most common UK small birds, but ones that don't visit my garden. So, I am always happy to have a chance to see them when I'm out and about and will always try and take a shot if an opportunity presents itself.

This one was a tricky task as sunset in mid-November in this part of the UK is 4:15pm, and it was already 4:30pm when I found the birds.

There was still a trickle of light left in the sky, cutting through the dense but almost bare trees as the birds prepared to roost.

I quickly realised I could either push the ISO to a point where the noise would really spoil the shot or attempt to shoot at a shutter speed well below the recommended 1/focal length for a long lense and ruin it with camera shake instead.

I shortened the lens to 380mm, braced myself against a tree as firmly as I could and wound the shutter speed down, watching the exposure needle creep towards the middle of the scale. Click...click...two shots and he was gone.

I looked at the exif data on the camera and saw 1/40s. I thought, that's probably the slowest shutter speed I have ever shot with this lens. And it was, until 10 seconds later when I got a lovely shot of a Dunnock at 1/30s.

You've gotta love image stabilisation!

6
Sundown (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by EvilTed@lemmy.world to c/birding@lemmy.world
 

Male Eurasian Chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs)

Rutland Nature Reserve, November 2019.

Nikon D7200, Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6

f6.3, 1/40s, ISO 500, 380mm

Chaffinches are one of the most common UK small birds, but ones that don't visit my garden. So, I am always happy to have a chance to see them when I'm out and about and will always try and take a shot if an opportunity presents itself.

This one was a tricky task as sunset in mid-November in this part of the UK is 4:15pm, and it was already 4:30pm when I found the birds.

There was still a trickle of light left in the sky, cutting through the dense but almost bare trees as the birds prepared to roost.

I quickly realised I could either push the ISO to a point where the noise would really spoil the shot or attempt to shoot at a shutter speed well below the recommended 1/focal length for a long lense and ruin it with camera shake instead.

I shortened the lens to 380mm, braced myself against a tree as firmly as I could and wound the shutter speed down, watching the exposure needle creep towards the middle of the scale. Click...click...two shots and he was gone.

I looked at the exif data on the camera and saw 1/40s. I thought, that's probably the slowest shutter speed I have ever shot with this lens. And it was, until 10 seconds later when I got a lovely shot of a Dunnock at 1/30s.

You've gotta love image stabilisation!

[–] EvilTed@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Looks like everything is back πŸ˜€

 

I've just noticed all my photos, and many from other members of this community, are no longer visible. I use Boost for most of my browsing, but it's the same on the website. I've posted on a support thread that another user raised about the same issue.

https://lemmy.world/comment/8247921

If your photos are missing as well it might be worth adding a comment for visibility.

74
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by EvilTed@lemmy.world to c/birding@lemmy.world
 

Razorbill (Alca torda)

Bempton Cliffs, East Yorkshire, UK, May 2019.

Nikon D7200, Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6

f/6.3, 1/800s, ISO 500, 420mm

f/6.3, 1/400s, ISO 500, 480mm

f/6.3, 1/1600s, ISO 800, 380mm

f/6.3, 1/2000s, ISO 800, 500mm

f/6.3, 1/640s, ISO 500, 420mm

Razorbills are truly fasinating birds and I think one of the most handsome. Their contrasting colouration and their bright yellow mouths and strong bills give them a really distinctive look.

They are member of the Auk family and are also known as the Razor-billed Auk, or Lesser Auk. Their closest relative is the now sadly exitinct Great Auk.

Like the other members of the Auk family, they spend most of their time out at sea, coming back to land for the breeding season. If you are ever lucky enough to watch them underwater you will see them using their wings as propulsion, in the same manner as a penguin.

Razorbills can be found around the coastlines of the North Atlantic and they generally live in large colonies. The Razorbill chooses only one partner for life and they only have one chick per year. They also don't start to breed until they are at least 3 years old and sometimes not until they are 5. They can also skip a breeding season as they get older. All this makes them very vulnerable to population decline.

I took these pictures at Bempton Cliffs on the East Yorkshire coast. Bempton and the surrounding Flamborough Head host England's largest onshore seabird breeding colonies, many species and over 300,000 birds. There can be as many as 20,000 pairs of Razorbills during the breeding season making it one of their largest colonies in the world.

From a photography stand point they can be a bit tricky. Like any black and white bird getting good exposure is always going to be a compromise. It is also difficult to get their eyes to standout from the surrounding feathers. However, they do seem to like to pose, they often display engrossing behaviours, and that yellow mouth makes an amazing contrast to the black head.

99
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by EvilTed@lemmy.world to c/birding@lemmy.world
 

Cormorant(Phalacrocorax carbo) vs European eel (Anguilla anguilla)

Nikon D7200, Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6

f/6.3, 1/2000s, ISO 500, 500mm

River Great Ouse, Camrbridgeshire, May 2019

This was another of those "right place, right time" situations. I walked a few miles to this spot on the river and was a little disappointed to see nothing on the water. I was about to head further down stream when this cormorant suddenly appeared. It had obviously been hunting in the rough waters of the weir and I hadn't noticed it.

Cormorants are sea birds, but in reality we get them in inland lakes and rivers almost all year round in the UK.

I took a couple of shots of the bird and then it disappeared again, surfacing only moments later with this frankly huge eel.

The European Eel is born in the Sargasso sea, a region of the North Atlantic ocean. It then migrates over the course of 300 days as a tiny larvae to the coasts of Europe .

When they reach the coast the larvae turn into tiny eels, which then move into a river. In the river they grow to adult size, taking anywhere up to 20 years, and then they head out to the Sargasso sea to breed and die.

In the UK a big eel is 5lb, though they can reach twice that, especially if they get trapped in a lake and can't return to breed. This was a big eel!

I watched the battle for about 15 minutes. The cormorant lost the eel a couple of times during the fight, but I suspect the initial attack had injured the fish, making its demise inevitable.

68
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by EvilTed@lemmy.world to c/birding@lemmy.world
 

Avocet (Recurvirostra avosetta)

Nikon D7200, Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6

f/6.3, 1/500s, ISO 500, 500mm Norfolk May 2019

f/6.3, 1/1600s, ISO 400, 500mm

This is the species that got me into bird watching. Over 40 years ago a teacher at my primary school was a member of the RSPB (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds) and told us stories, including the one about the symbol of the RSBP, the Avocet. A bird that was practically extinct in the UK by the 1940's.

At this point (early 80's) it was recovering but still a rare sight in the UK.

Fast forward a few decades and I had the pleasure of seeing hundreds of these birds for the first time on the North Norfolk coast. No longer rare, they are a UK conservation success story and one that I have been glad to be able to photograph.

103
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by EvilTed@lemmy.world to c/birding@lemmy.world
 

Great Tit (Parus major)

Nikon D7200, Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6

f/6.3, 1/500s, ISO 500, 500mm Cambridgeshire 2019

The largest Tit species found in the UK, its range covers almost the whole of the mainland, apart from the highest parts of the the Scottish highlands.

It can be a bit of a bully and I see it on our bird feeders pushing off other species including Starlings, which takes some doing!

It has a distinctive call that sounds very much like Teacher! Teacher!

23
Costah (lemmy.world)
 

A young couple in love, watching the world walk by.

Portugal 2019

 

Northern Wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe)

Nikon D7200, Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6

f/6.3, 1/500s, ISO 500, 480mm

Orkney 2016

Male

Nikon D7200, Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6

f/5.6, 1/800s, ISO 500, 350mm

Mull 2017

Female

Nikon D850, Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6

f/6.3, 1/500s, ISO 500, 480mm

Isle of Lewis 2023

Male

Another absolute favourite bird that I only get to see when my travels take me to Scotland and the North of England. You can find them in Wales and in the South-West but I haven't seen them there. You will also need to be in the right location -moorland and heathland - and the correct time of year as the migrate to the UK in early March and leave back for Africa in October.

79
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by EvilTed@lemmy.world to c/birding@lemmy.world
 

Dunnock (Prunella modularis)

Nikon D850, Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6

f/6.3, 1/1250s, ISO 500, 460mm

May 2020.

A bird I think doesn't get the attention it deserves.

Dunnock comes from the old english, Dun meaning dingy brown and Ock, meaning small. Which I think is a rather unfair description. I have found them to be both beautiful and charming.

As you can see from these pictures they have a soft grey colour on the front that merges into to the brown and black feathers of the head and back. At the height of the breeding season the grey feathers can have a blue sheen.

I watched this bird doing a mating display on top of this post for at least 10 minutes. It was the first time I had seen this in this species and it was very entertaining as it did a skipping, wingless dance trying to attract the attention of a female.

view more: next β€Ί