342345

My knowledge stems from just my memory of one or two documentations I watched. But there they stated that the gmo advantage is just a marketing lie in the long run, because nature adapts and yields decrease and herbicide/ fungicide usage increases.

Is there a study that shows that gmo performs better (yield wise, impact on the fauna, toxicity) than all other approaches?

Ich wollte gern wissen, um was es konkret geht. Die der Wertung zugrunde liegenden Aussagen oder Taten brauche ich, um zu wissen ob ich ihr zustimmen möchte oder nicht.

Ich finde schon. :)

I need a sabbatical. Canada maybe or New Zealand. A retreat to a monastery also sounds nice. I will rebuild an old farm house. Something along these lines. :)

It doesn't have to be the truth, or does it?

Uh. Dann bloß keine Liegestütze. Aber Amthor als Ersatz ist schon hart.

Gute Besserung.

A big problem is that farmers are not allowed to use the corn and and grain which they grew themselves on their own field as seeds. When they buy the engineered seeds and accompanied pesticides they are forced to do it every year.

That's a dangerous development in my opinion. You must not centralise seed production in that way.

Plus: the Roundup stuff really doesn't look healthy to me.

Liegestütze > Amthor :P

Danke für die Erklärung. Wählerstimmenfang auf Kosten der Sozialhilfeempfänger also.

Kontext?

Hat da jemand Eiertag gesagt?

Der arme Lurch.

Normal bezogen auf was? :)

I attributed that to the drawing style, as the colours can also be found in the other panels.