this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

Space

2 readers
2 users here now

Cover author: Michał Kałużny http://astrofotografia.pl/

founded 2 years ago
 

We have no explanations for this sort of slow repeat.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] I_Miss_Daniel@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Probably a solar garden light that got flung into space and is rotating.

[–] twistedtxb@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago
[–] HolyDuckTurtle@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GPM J1839–10 takes 22 minutes between pulses.

End Times starts playing

[–] TeaHands@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

*breaks out the marshmallows*

[–] niktemadur@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article makes no mention of the possibility of this being a binary system of some sort, although I would guess the physics involved for this type of burst are equally lacking in current models.

[–] stevecrox@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Because that doesn't fit.

The object sends X-ray pulses for 30-300 seconds every 22 minutes.

For a binary star system we would expect to see pulses while the neutron star is not behind the star and a short period without any pulses while the other star blocks it. Which is the inverse of the recorded pattern

In a tertiary or greater star system you could have longer periods where the star is blocked but the time between pulses would vary depending on the positions of other stars.

Personally I think it will end up being a pulsar that is slowing down and becoming a regular neutron star with something externally adding/removing mass from it causing it to speed up again.