So...
Revenge porn laws cover this and she'll be charged any day now...
Right?
Because not holding them accountable hasn't worked so far
@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.
So...
Revenge porn laws cover this and she'll be charged any day now...
Right?
Because not holding them accountable hasn't worked so far
Probably not because of the speech and debate clause.
Unconscionable.
Insane
Predictable
churlish
Like do we really care what Chelsie Clinton is doing?
Do we care about anyone elses children besides trump and biden?
This is all contrived nonsense if you break a law go to court you are innocent or guilty.
Boom conversation over.
I'm not sure about the procedures when a member of Congress waves photos of someone else's member. Does this mean that imagery of Hunter Biden's privates are not to be part of the Congressional Record?
I’d ask what’s wrong with her, but it would be easier to ask what ISN’T.