I assume the reason they won't let you save scum is because they have consumable microtransactions.
this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
-1 points (45.5% liked)
Gaming
20015 readers
947 users here now
Sub for any gaming related content!
Rules:
- 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
- 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
- 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
The author apparently doesn't know that BG3 (and a lot of other games) has an honour mode that doesn't allow save scumming, so people can choose to play the exact same way if they want to.
Yeah for these things I think having an option is best. I personally don't play this way but I can see the appeal. I don't really see the harm in letting people play how they want to play
Larian doesn't lock your save files to an online server. You can jump into appdata and save scum manually even in honour mode.
Problem is that Dragon’s dogma 2’a save system is pretty unpredictable. It’s autosave can be too aggressive where when you load a last save you might not be able to get out of a bad situation and Last Inn save might be from hours past so you can lose hours of progress, which can severely hamper the exploration. I feel like Inn save must instead be a Camp save, which would have been best of the both worlds.
For me the problem is that it just feels like a poor imitation of the way it’s done in Dark Souls / Bloodborne / Elden Ring.