this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
111 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2056 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is a big deal because it means that it no longer suffices for Biden to win MI + WI + PA + the solid blue states; he would need to win at least one other swing state in order to be re-elected.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 77 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yes let’s take the one thing the state famously does right and make it have the same problem every other state does.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago

Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen (R)

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Close to right I would say. If the districts are gerrymandered the Republican could get all of the electors except the at-large ones. Better rule would be to award electors proportionally.

[–] gaael@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Or even cut the middlemen and directly elect your president ?

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 43 points 8 months ago

Hell yeah, let's change the rules mid election year.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fuck this governor so hard.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Naw. 10 inch dia. hydraulic piston. Rusty.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That would be such a poor move.

[–] silence7 10 points 8 months ago

Good or bad, what matters to him (and other Republicans) is that they see it as benefiting their billionaire patrons.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Jim Pillen (R) endorsed switching the state to a “winner-take-all” system for Electoral College votes on Tuesday, a change that would bring the state in line with the rest of the country and could tip the 2024 election.

Only Nebraska and Maine assign Electoral College votes by district.

In most elections, Republicans take two and Democrats take one of the state’s votes, though the third is tightly contested.

State legislators introduced a measure to implement the winner-take-all system in January, which Pillen endorsed.

“I call upon fellow Republicans in the Legislature to pass this bill to my desk so I can sign it into law.”

If the bill were to go into effect for the 2024 election, it could cost President Biden an Electoral College vote.


The original article contains 258 words, the summary contains 126 words. Saved 51%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!