I don't understand why this wasn't done on day 1 of the invasion.
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
International law I reckon.
Really? Any lawyers or something can verify?
Surely if international law applied back then, then it still does? What has changed?
Laws do change actually and thats a good thing.
Because international law isn’t a real thing, not in any sense that makes it similar to the internal laws of a state.
Right so the argument is that back at the start of the invasion, Russia had not done a lot of damage (monetarily speaking) but now it has done so much damage that the frozen assets don't even pay the whole bill, so taking it is akin to taking the assets of someone with a lot of debt.
I guess it kinda makes sense. Still think they should've taken it right at the start though. This war shouldn't have gone on for so long like this.
Because if you want everyone to use your banking cartel, stealing people's money as a political ploy tends to scare them away.
Or just don't launch full scale invasions against sovereign countries? Is that bar too high?
Only we can do that
Wait, did the US claim Iraq or Afghanistan their territory?
The US did give lots of assets to those countries to rebuild. Not nearly enough and I would support other countries freezing US assets and giving them to those countries to help rebuild.
America installed a government that kidnapped little boys to rape them and transformed the entire economy into an opium farm,
Then they left and stole 7 Billion in Afghan assets.
For more info: https://youtu.be/SHcl-3vo2_0?si=8RZQpSodPPscCaDO
Guy I'm agreeing with you?
Sorry my bad. The answer is they claimed both and still occupy iraq
Instruction unclear. I proceeded to launch invasions against non sovereign countries
Property rights are kinda a big deal in The West. Plus capital from less savory regimes brings in much needed liquidity in western markets. Ceasing this capital will make it less likely that The West is seen as a safe haven for investment from those kinds of countries. On the long term this might even cause a parallel financial system to arise, which would be very bad news for the US and it’s reserve currency.
Yeah why not? Consider it reparations.
I'd say look what happened after we did that to Germany, but Russia seems to get worse with or without encouragement
This is the best summary I could come up with:
WASHINGTON (AP) — Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on Tuesday offered her strongest public support yet for the idea of liquidating roughly $300 billion in frozen Russian Central Bank assets and using them for Ukraine’s long-term reconstruction.
“It is necessary and urgent for our coalition to find a way to unlock the value of these immobilized assets to support Ukraine’s continued resistance and long-term reconstruction,” Yellen said in remarks in Sao Paulo, Brazil, where Group of 20 finance ministers and central bank governors are meeting this week.
The idea of using Russia’s frozen assets has gained traction lately as continued allied funding for Ukraine becomes more uncertain and the U.S. Congress is in a stalemate over providing more support.
Yellen said Tuesday that it is “extremely unlikely” that tapping the frozen funds would harm the dollar’s standing in the global economy “especially given the uniqueness of the situation where Russia is brazenly violating international norms.
John Kirby, President Joe Biden’s national security spokesman, said at a White House press briefing Tuesday that “we still believe Russia needs to be responsible for the damage” brought onto Ukraine by “exploring the option of using those frozen assets.”
Earlier this month, the European Union passed a law to set aside windfall profits generated from frozen Russian central bank assets.
The original article contains 533 words, the summary contains 215 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Please do it. Make it so every other government withdraws their reserves once they know you'll steal them if the opportunity arises.
I think Russia had ample warning that there'd be consequences.