this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)

Selfhosted

40018 readers
671 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I believe there are pros and cons for both. Imgur is great because you truly don't have to think about disk space or bandwidth. Imgur is not great because they can delete your posts at any time without warning and leave holes on the interenet, especially if we're talking 5, 10 , 20 years from now.

Should I invest in a beefy server to store all of my photo needs without storage anixety? Or should I just rely on a larger company to handle it for me? I think I'm already answering my own question by writing this post out, but I'd love to hear from the self hosting community.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s another option- cloud hosting in a cloud you control. You can also put a CDN infront of a not-so-beefy home server to avoid getting overwhelmed.

[–] charles@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I was about to reply that not every user should be expected to self-host instances, but checked where I was before hitting send. A CDN to front images is a great option, but iirc the cache headers still aren't sorted out properly, so be wary about fronting your whole Lemmy instance with a CDN.

[–] master@lem.serkozh.me 2 points 1 year ago

should I just rely on a larger company to handle it for me?

No, unless you have a paid contract with them that specifies heavy liability if they decide to screw you

I'd think that a few terrabytes in a server would mean that you wouldn't have to worry about image files for a while

You mentioned a timescale for data retention of decades which means doing it yourself is the only option.

Nothing that exists now existed either 20 years before now or is likely to exist in 20 years: I’m sure you can still download all those photos off your Friendster account or from photobucket (in case of confusion: lol no).

Of course with a multi-decade requirement, then you’re going to have to manage hardware, backups, and validating data integrity. The last one being the big one because everything will bitrot if you give it enough time, so it’s not like it’s just drop it on a drive and forget about it.

[–] qazwsxedcrfv000@lemmy.unknownsys.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You are talking about your own photos or photos you wanna share with others? If it is the former, with all due respect but I have to say it is insane to put them all to imgur. Heck even uploading them all to Google Cloud is a lot more reasonable.... If it is the latter, it is fine as long as you are not expecting the images to live forever.

load more comments
view more: next ›