this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
491 points (78.9% liked)

memes

10217 readers
2024 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

CloudConvert.com might as well be my fucking home page.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 154 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Webp

Developed by google, for google products.

Not guaranteed to work with google products (looking at you google voice.)

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 91 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] SeedyOne@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

The Google Way.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shootwhatsmyname@lemm.ee 138 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

You get the exact same quality at around ~25% smaller than other image formats. Unfortunate that it’s not supported by everything, but yeah it’s a better image format practically in that sense.

On the web this saves money when storing at a large scale, and it can have a significant impact on page speed when loading websites on slower connections.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My problem is the way it's packaged as a link to a website that hosts the jpeg image. Saving, modifying, and using the image file becomes impossible in some workflows. Imagine a future where you get fined for stealing memes. I bet they could make the image file size even smaller without all of that bullshit added in, until then I'm just using an extension to convert to png (which results in loss btw).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LucidLethargy@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago (11 children)

People just really need to support it. It's far better than jpg or png. It's the go-to for web right now, that's for sure.

[–] hansl@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not better than jpegXL which has clearer free licensing.

[–] LucidLethargy@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Only Apple supports this. Like, literally just Apple. I hate Chrome, and even Chrome doesn't support this. Firefox? Yeah, zero support.

So for these reasons it's 100% not viable right now. If you get the support, I'll consider it for my websites, and tell my colleagues about it, though.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 80 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As someone who has had to put together websites:

  • It is supported by every major browser
  • It is halving the amount of your mobile data that I am using sending you images (With lossy compression it does even better)
  • It is decreasing my network egress costs
  • It is increasing the number of connections I can serve in a given time period

Nope I am not going to stop using this or AVIF (which does better)

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 74 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's straight up better though

[–] RacoonVegetable@reddthat.com 15 points 1 year ago

AVIF wants to know your location

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 70 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Is this the latest hate trend? Is it that time of the year again?

[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 1 year ago (8 children)

How can one even get annoyed this much by WebP lol

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago

at this point i will take any open image format newer than png

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

The problem is rather the opposite of the meme. The file format is fine, but there is so little effort into making it happen.

If we were trying then I should be able to upload webp images everywhere. The most egregious is websites that will convert jpg and png uploads to webp but don't allow webp upload.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] wax@lemmy.wtf 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I've personally used webp for when I need lossy compression with alpha channel. What good alternatives are there? Png is not lossy and jpeg does not support alpha. Is JXL better than WebP? AVIF? JPEG2000?

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

pngout can often get image sizes down below equivalent jpeg without quality loss. And it's not a new format, just optimizing the existing png file.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago

I host my own server for playing TTRPGs on and webp saves me a lot of storage space and bandwidth.

[–] regbin_@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

WebP is awesome. So is JPEG-XL.

JPEG and PNG are archaic and should die already.

.jxl is also coming btw

[–] frezik@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

JPEG will never die. Too many things support it at a very basic level. A random CCD camera module on DigiKey probably has an option for direct JPEG output. An 8-bit Arduino will know how to take that JPEG and display it on a cheap 4" LCD screen off Bang Good.

Formats that sprawl everywhere like that will never, ever die.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't had an issue with webp support myself, kinda surprised to see people stating it like it happens all the time

The only tool I've used that didn't support it was the FOMOD creation tool when making some small Starfield foods, and that actually DID support webp, it just threw an error but would show the image and mod managers would load it no problem

Or is this an example of the difference between people who use Linux and Windows regularly?

[–] NBJack@reddthat.com 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Want that cool image as a background? Whoops.

Want to use that image with that nifty ML tool you downloaded? Uh oh.

That random web service at least five years old with an upload field for an image? Roll the dice; win on snake eyes.

Want to use that picture as an avatar in a forum that isn't that popular? Hmmm.

How about that WordPress blog of yours? Hopefully on 5.8 or better; otherwise unsupported natively.

Would you like thumbnails on these downloads in your favorite Linix distro? Uh, maybe; Ubuntu didn't get it until 22.10.

How about Windows? Well, 11 is fine, but 10 needs an extension.

None of this can't be overcome with some effort, but it's kind of painful right now.

[–] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Webp is superior to jpg and far smaller than png. Making a map tile that has transparency and is bigger than 20x20 grid squares leaves you the choice between a huge png or a tiny webp. VTTs like foundry have best practice guidelines re image sizes and formats and it is simply not possible to follow these using png unless the map in question is tiny, and if you ignore them and just go for a huge png your players may be faced with lag, longer loading times etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I use an extension that automatically converts it. I can't stand webp

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If it's for firefox then I'm gonna need the name of said extension

[–] Nanosapiens@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not OP, but I've been using WebP / Avif image converter for many months now and am very satisfied with it.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If jpg and png were good enough for dialup, they're good enough for gigabit.

[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You clearly don't recall watching jpegs load on dialup internet. It could literally take minutes to load a decent sized image on 14.4 modems.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] awesome357@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From someone using foundry, please continue to use webp and webm... Foundry easily supports it and the file sizes are much smaller making them take up much less space on my server. And upload faster, and load faster for me and my players, and let me upload larger maps for my players as they render easier.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

I just use ImageMagick

mogrify -format png *.webp

[–] Doodleschmit@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a little out of the loop on webp. What makes it problematic?

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago (13 children)

A lot of things don't support it yet, but it's technically a better compression format

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

This is how every new thing starts though. You don't just get better standards overnight. Jpg and png didn't happen overnight either. PNG had this problem for quite a while.

It's not a problem with WebP. It's a problem with tooling that aren't moving forwards to objectively more effective formats.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›