this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
415 points (91.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
807 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One of the most aggravating things to me in this world has to be the absolutely rampant anti-intellectualism that dominates so many conversations and debates, and its influence just seems to be expanding. Do you think there will ever actually be a time when this ends? I'd hope so once people become more educated and cultural changes eventually happen, but as of now it honestly infuriates me like few things ever have.

(page 4) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] writeblankspace@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm fine with people who really just don't know stuff. But they should really listen when you try to explain something to them.

* cough cough * flat earthers?

[–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No.

It’s human nature to want to be the best, the most loved, the top dog. It helps to propagate the species.

If someone is smarter than you, it digs at the very core of that, and becomes a threat.

[–] ThePenitentOne@discuss.online -1 points 1 year ago

I think 'human nature' is far too broad to define in such a way, and making objective statements about it is wrong. In my opinion, the only definite thing you can say is that humans act out of self-interest (as do all living beings), but the motivation derived from it doesn't have to be destructive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is the world anti-intellectual or anti-“know-it-all”-poindexter?

I haven’t noticed anti-intellectualism but the reject of disrespectful and bad-faith discourse.

This is probably inevitable because science has been politicized in America.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

From what I've heard, this is mostly a US phenomenon.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] OptimusPhillip@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the claim that the world is anti-intellectual is somewhat biased. I don't know if that's a sampling bias, a cognitive bias, or some other kind of bias. But one way or another, I feel like you're overblowing things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vsh@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Being stupid is a trend. People love being quirky.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're talking about mostly religion. Not one specific but for all of them to work they have to dumb people down, otherwise why would you follow crazy rules if you can have your faith at home without crazyness?

I believe that in a far future, as humanity gather more and more knowledge keeping religion up will be kind of hard, but until them we will have to go through the "dark ages of christianism" where our lifes will be controled by some old conservarive people. But they will die out.

[–] Chunk@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Unfortunately I don't think this is mostly religion. A lot of people are stupid. Sincere question, when was the last time you talked to a normie?

I chatted with my hairdresser yesterday. She didn't know:

  • what a DMZ is.
  • who SBF or Elizabeth Holmes are.
  • that there is an anti trust case against Google.
  • the word "query" as in "search query".

For Halloween my girlfriend and I are going as SBF and Elizabeth Holmes. She commented that "no one outside [my] little circle is going to know who those people are." I started to disagree but, in a way, she's right.

Don't get me wrong, she's wonderful and hilarious and chill af. She's just a bit dumb. And that's okay but it's true.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't think anyone's anti intellectual, people use rhetoric to defend their ideas, to defend their ways, to justify what they've already done. If you used your intelligence and started to agree with people, no one would challenge you, you wouldn't run into anti-intellectual bias.

When you challenge people, or disagree with them, they're going to use rhetoric against you, and that often is portrayed as anti-intellectual. If they think you're a threat they'll attack you by any means possible

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] calypsopub@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I say we should provide UBI to everyone, legalize drugs, and let the stupid ones rot on their couch doing weed, playing video games, and streaming anime or porn. Hopefully they'll be too lazy to vote or commit crimes, and the rest of us can work on creating a better society with them safely out of the way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thisfox@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

In my experience, anti-intellectualism is a yank trait, not a worldwide trait. Ask a German, or someone from Japan, for confirmation.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›