US media is certainly working hard to manufacture consent for a nuclear holocaust right now.
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2022
17 points (100.0% liked)
World News
32285 readers
594 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
π€ I wonder do you consider nukes to be a weapon of "combat battle"?
What does that even mean?
Okay, I'll try that again but slower: do you support using a tactical nuclear weapons on a battlefield?
I do not support the use of nuclear weapons, and the only country that has an ambiguous stance on using nuclear weapons is US.
I do not support the use of nuclear weapons
Including when Russia doing it? Or is there some 4D chess kicking in in that moment?
Except Russia isn't doing it, if it did I would condemn it. In the real world, it's the U.S. that threatens to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear threat.
Russia made a statement that included using nuclear weapons to defend any land it sees itself as owning while at the same time declaring land that it doesn't even occupy to be part of Russia. I don't see how that's not a massive escalation.
We went over this before Russia never made such a statement. The only time Russia will use nuclear weapons would be in case of an existential threat to Russia. This is the official Russian nuclear stance and it has never changed. You keep trying to twist it into something that it's not, and I wonder why you keep insisting on doing that. Could you explain yourself here?
This was the statement:
In the event of a threat to the territorial integrity of our country and to defend Russia and our people, we will certainly make use of all weapon systems available to us. This is not a bluff.
Russia official counts parts of Ukraine that it does not occupy as its territory, so accordingly all bets are off on what weapons it can use.
Speaking of that nuclear stance, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (creators of the Doomsday Clock) was rather unimpressed. There's plenty of fine print that leaves room to use nuclear weapons under conditions that you are not envisioning. A Ukraine in NATO? Under certain views, that's an existential threat to Russia, even if NATO has no interest in ever crossing Russian borders.
Once again, Russia's nuclear stance is not that it will use nuclear weapons if its territory is attacked. The stance is that Russia will use nuclear weapons in case of an existential threat. Do you not understand the difference between those statements, or are you intentionally ignoring it?
I'm reading over the policy and seeing that there's enough room in there to launch a rocket if someone was stupid enough to want to. You just have to think that the state is under threat due to the loss of the invasion into Ukraine.
That's emphatically not what the document says.
The United States is a real danger to the planet and to world peace. Elders who govern, a moron longing for dictators and another who is unable to find the exit from the podium without a GPS.
For fuck's sake, have you seen the new spatial army uniform? Unapologetic fascist design
This have very strong vibes of British Empire In Space, i guess they read a lot of Weber, Sterling, Drake, Honsinger etc. books.
Nice to see you again comrade!
Link?
This is official
Yes.
That is all, there is literally nothing more to say. Continuing down this path will lead to the eradication of humanity.
Russiaβs invasion earlier this year accelerated the profiteering
The fuck is this noise? As I've said time and time again, it was Russia's choice to invade Ukraine. Trying to blame it on the US or NATO is just bullshit blame shifting.
And you're still lying
And what forced Russia to invade? Did the US secretly put neurotoxin in Putin's underwear? Were they threatening to invade Russia?
Do you just ignore us or did you not know how to read the whole time we were arguing with you
I read every bit, and when it's a bunch of hogwash I usually chuckle to myself as well. What of it?
Probably not, since China seems to have ordered Russia to stop threatening the world with Nuclear Annihilation.
More likely, rulers who have been rulers for far too long will lead to it. Russia's Putin, North Korea's Kim dynasty, possibly China's Xi Jinping some time later if he keeps hanging to power for another decade.
Civilized countries don't use nukes. The threat is the one uncivilized country that uses nukes.
Lol
Please Yes
Ban this guy