this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
19 points (95.2% liked)

Quark's

1108 readers
72 users here now

Come to Quark’s, Quark’s is Fun!

General off-topic chat for the crew of startrek.website. Trek-adjacent discussions, other sci-fi television, navigating the Fediverse, server meta (within reason), selling expired cases of Yamok sauce, it’s all fair game.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Some interesting details mixed in this assessment. Since there’s been relatively little promotion, thought others would appreciate the amplification.

all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, that's pretty much in line with my expectations, based on the premise. I can live with it.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

An Inverse review provides another take, and reports on comments from Straczynski and Boxleitner about what the ending means for a future Bab 5 semi-reboot/reimagining. (There’s some kind of discussion bonus feature on the DVD.)

It’s a huge spoiler. Both for the new animated story but also the future of the Babylon 5 franchise. Not sure how I’m feeling about this. Adding this here more as a content warning for those who don’t want to be spoiled.

Spoiler

spoiler

And here’s the rub. Once “normal” Sheridan returns to his correct universe, the ending of the movie remains in the new, peaceful non-Shadow War version of the Babylon 5 timeline. On the commentary track on the Blu-ray, Straczynski makes it clear that yes, this is a not-so-soft reboot, saying: “It reboots the Babylon 5 universe and we may or may not have the Shadow War, and everyone is there, in the beginning, as it were, and the slate is clean. We can do whatever we want.”

Interesting. I read the spoiler because I fear nothing.

spoilerThis may be JMS's way of "legitimizing" the reboot-that-was-ordered-by-The-CW-that-hasn't-technically-been-cancelled-but-probably-won't-happen-because-The-CW-imploded.

[–] quinkin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I thought it was alright. For something built around big long story arcs it was intrinsically limited but still enjoyable.