this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
103 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37724 readers
649 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On March 7, 2024, Google inexplicably downranked the website of Tuta Mail in its search results. While Tuta Mail is a prominent provider of encrypted email services, focusing on security and privacy, our website was deranked for terms like “secure email” and “encrypted email” completely. The search results for our website was limited exclusively to so called “branded” search terms, e.g. search terms that included our brand name like Tuta, Tutanota, or Tutamail. In consequence, only people who already knew that Tuta existed were able to find our website via Google Search – any new potential customers were not able to find our encrypted email solution.

Faced with this immense problem with Google Search and a drop in visibility of the Tuta website by ~90% in Google's search results, we tried to get in touch with Google, both through official channels and on social media, but in vain. So on April 24, we submitted a formal complaint to the EU so that the EU could investigate whether Google’s actions in downranking a direct competitor violates the newly issued Digital Markets Act (DMA). We welcome the fact that the EU has already started an investigation against Google, Apple, and Meta in regards to whether these big tech companies are sufficiently complying with the DMA regulation. Not being legal experts here, but what Google has been doing to our website and what Apple is doing with their new App store policy for app developers, seem like obvious examples of malicious compliance.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As a Tuta user .... go get 'em!!

[–] PhreakyByNature@feddit.uk 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As a non-user I'm now intrigued by it!

[–] tardigrada@beehaw.org 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I am thinking the same. Must be some sort of Streisand effect :-)

[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago

Ha. I certainly think they're worth checking out. For my use case (anti-goog, privacy is key,, relatively few emails per month but those are critical to me, custom domain) Tuta works well. I've had it for about 3 years and no issues at all.

[–] seang96@spgrn.com 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I see you don't use FCM for push notifications. Are there plans fpr supporting https://unifiedpush.org/?

Edit looks like that's a no, and ignored in bug reports and feature requests only on reddit. The email service got me interested, but not till unified push is supported

Edit realize OP is not them mixed that by reading the post haha

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It does have notifications though.

[–] seang96@spgrn.com 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Sure but it's another constant background connectiom instead of using something that combines them all into one (a push server). It's great not using Google's push server, but I'd rather something not eat more of my phones battery when it could use my own private push server that's already running in the background.