this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
292 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2215 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 134 points 6 months ago (1 children)

man unwilling to compromise or negotiate in good faith blames everyone else for not compromising

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 104 points 6 months ago

Don’t let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 101 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He is continuing to caucus with the Dems. The senate will remain 51 / 49 in favor of the Dems.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna154885

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's the way he gets to be a one man Senate.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I guess he could threaten to caucus with the RNC if he wanted to throw a fit. But, it’s also 5 months until the election and the senate is basically only campaigning right now. They’re not dealing with much legislation. Their schedule for the remainder of the year is kind of comical.

If this was supposed to be some sort of power play, the time for that was several months or years ago, not on his way out the door.

[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 23 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He's not running though? This is him changing his personal party choice for voting.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He's not running as a Democrat. The deadline for filing as an independent in WV is August 1, and your application can be challenged if you changed parties in the last two months. So this move was purely to preserve his ability to step into the race for Governor or Senate at the last minute, if he thought he could win.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Or if they'll pay him to split the D vote to ensure an R win.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Manchin isn't running for his seat again because he is going to lose to the same kind of asshole he is, but with the magic ( R ) after his name.

Democrats hate him, because every Biden policy that was blocked for the first two years of his term was Manchin's fault.

Manchin running as an independent isn't gonna split the Dem vote. In fact, I'll say the opposite: he'd split the GOP vote. Republicans who won't vote for the convict, but also won't hold their nose to vote for Biden, would probably find Manchin acceptable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

He’s not running, but his party will change in the senate, and he can elect to caucus with the GOP if he wanted. Which would put the Senate at 50 / 50.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 74 points 6 months ago

Fuck that guy.

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 49 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The real question then is whether the dems are willing to run someone solid and progressive against him, and whether that person would have a shot...

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Democrats are not willing to run someone progressive for his or any other seat, regardless of that candidate's chances of winning.

[–] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are a handful of progressives in the Democratic party, against the party's wishes.

[–] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

And the party establishment can and has changed over time, the Democratic Party of 1890, or 1910, or 1930, or 1970, were massively different parties.

The party has generally trended more progressive over time on everything except economics, and that's starting to change with the tepid integration of democratic socialists.

[–] 108@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago

Well… bye

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

Good riddance. Fucker.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

RFK Jr isn't working.

Bet he runs as the spoiler.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Another spoiler for Republicans, same as RFK. I can't see any Dems voting for the guy who fucked Biden's agenda so much over the last four years, but it's totally believable that there would be Republicans who don't want to vote for their convicted criminal nominee but also are too brainwashed to vote for Biden.

If Manchin runs as an independent, I predict he'd have the exact same result as RFK: more Republicans would vote for him than Democrats.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I can't see any Dems voting for the guy who fucked Biden's agenda

Really? Because all of the people I've ever seen defending him were Democrats claiming that he was the least awful senator West Virginia would ever vote for.

Hell, even Biden himself gave Manchin the pen used to sign what was left of one of the bills after he'd hollowed out the carcass!

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It sounds like you're deliberately ignoring that there's a difference between actually liking him and being realistic that no other Dem is going to the Senate from a state where Donald wins by 39 points.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don’t know why he’s doing this. It changes nothing.

  1. he’s still caucusing with the Democrats for the useless remainder of this session
  2. he’s still likely leaving in 6 months
  3. if he were to change his mind and decide to run one last time, he’s still likely to lose to Republican Governor Jim Justice.

This is like trying to put salt and pepper on sandwich someone threw in the trash. It doesn’t matter. No one was going to eat that thing, and it’s going into the landfill tomorrow.

[–] jabeez@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Presidential run in four years? Can claim to be the most centrist-y centrist that ever centrist-ed?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Had to check, he's 76. Will be 80 by then. Please no.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

Hell hes been a monkeywrench in there for as long as i can remember. Let him screw the other guys for a while

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 6 months ago

Surprising no one. A repub in dem’s skin the whole time. Besides him and Sinema (sp?), there was this other lady who ran as a dem but clearly lied about positions and flipped without announcing a party change once elected. I don’t remember who, just saw a repost of a Tok about her. They are shameless in their lies and facades.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Most important thing to note, he is still caucusing with the Democrats, and the Senate is not going 50 / 50. It will remain 51 / 49.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

About time.

load more comments
view more: next ›