this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
1121 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck AI

1513 readers
166 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arken@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

So your argument is politics should be cartoonish, stylized and theatrical instead of nuanced and actually constructive? Congratulations, you got your wish. Just be sure to make the most of it before the masters of simplification and emotionally charged language - the fascists - take over, it's just a matter of time I guess.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Arguments about politics don’t need a 2000 word essay on the meaning of Daisy’s pier light being green instead of yellow.

[–] arken@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

No one is arguing that. Less-dumbed-down, thoughtful and well-formulated arguments and debates would benefit everyone, though. Especially if the audience is educated enough to be able to appreciate them.

[–] notanaltaccount@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The mansion in which Daisy resides with whats-his-name has a light at its end. It blinks green.

[–] notanaltaccount@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Probably so ships don’t bump into it?

[–] notanaltaccount@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I am really glad the hot dude never asked me about that

[–] notanaltaccount@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I disagree that nuanced and sophisticated english language skills are needed for debates. Even getting into complex debates can be done without nuanced language.

I think if 3 years of English Lit were replaced with ecological science, society would be less likely to perish.

I am not as optomistic as you that somehow complex boring books are a panacea for fascism, which is not only linked to ignorance, but also religion and usually prejudiced analysis that is passed on through word of mouth or online and rarely refuted. Hamlet won't stop Nazism.

Facism also tends to increase when groups in society feel like their quality of life is declining and they don't understand the economics involved or how to change it and invent a type of mythology to explain things they can't grasp. A better way of reducing fascism is by teaching an anti-fascism course in school AND reducing inflation by not doing things that will cause bizarre secondary economic effects but sound good to naive voters.

For instance:

"let's raise the minimum wage to 30 dollar so everyone is comfortable"

vs

"let's eliminate the minimum wage entirely and provide free health care and a $200 housing voucher for people who need it funded by taxes"

one of those makes people happy but fucks up the economy and increases inflation, and one improves things without causing bizarre secondary problems, and the average voter doesn't know the difference

The idea that "Oh, if all the morons likely to believe facist ideology are just taught Hamlet, it will all be okay" probably over-estimates the iq of the average person who would read it. Facism stems more from changes in living standards and a lack of feelings of control rather than from an ability to reason.

[–] arken@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The idea that "Oh, if all the morons likely to believe facist ideology are just taught Hamlet, it will all be okay"

Well, of course nobody said that, it's a gross oversimplification of my argument - a strawman - which I guess is very fitting in this context.

[–] notanaltaccount@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

That's not true, it's literally what you said.

To quoeth you exactly, you said "Hamlet, that will fix them Nazis."