this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
161 points (89.7% liked)

Religious Cringe

823 readers
1 users here now

About

This is the official Lemmy for the r/ReligiousCringe***** subreddit. This is a community about poking fun at the religious fundamentalist's who take their religion a little bit too far. Here you will find religious content that is so outrageous and so cringeworthy that even someone who is mildly religious will cringe.

Rules

  1. All posts must contain religious cringe. All posts must be made from a religious person or must be showcasing some kind of religious bigotry. The only exception to this is rule 2

  2. Material about religious bigots made by non-bigots is only allowed from Friday-Sunday EST. In an effort to keep this community on the topic of religious cringe and bigotry we have decide to limit stuff like atheist memes to only the weekends.

  3. No direct links to religious cringe. To prevent religious bigots from getting our clicks and views directs links to religious cringe are not allowed. If you must a post a screenshot of the site or use archive.ph. If it is a YouTube video please use a YouTube frontend like Piped or Invidious

  4. No Proselytizing. Proselytizing is defined as trying to convert someone to a particular religion or certain world view. Doing so will get you banned.

  5. Spammers and Trolls will be instantly banned. No exceptions.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheistmemes@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I mean, it’s not unlikely that there was a dude named jesus christ, two millennia ago. There are a couple of other details in the story that are pretty suspect though, and I really doubt he’s able to be consulted for political opinions either way.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

His name would have been Yeshua (short form of Yehoshua), with the name translated first into Greek then into Latin and morphing into a form that became Jesus. Yeshua was also a common name. It's actually more complex than that, as language and words over time get very mangled.

As for evidence of a singular guy of any name doing this stuff, there isn't much at all that isn't connected to the Bible in a circular reasoning. Without Saul/Paul renewing (or creating) a faith about someone long gone in his lifetime, it would have likely ended there. There could have been many iconic figures doing things with followers that didn't jump the gap of history to become a permanent religion.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Was there an itinerant preacher on which the biblical character of Jesus was loosely based on? Almost certainly. Does that make the stories of Jesus as depicted in the gospels 100% true? Absolutely not.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Was Paul an absolute shit bag? Almost certainly so.

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The modern form of Yeshua is Joshua.

Christianity should be called Paulinism, because he saw an opportunity, like any good politician, and took advantage of it.

[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 5 months ago (4 children)

There is literally zero chance that anyone was named Jesus Christ. The word (not name) "christ" means "king," and was attached to the name centuries after he supposedly lived.

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Also his name would've been something more like Yeshua, not Jesus.

[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I also read somewhere that the real person he may have been based on was named Benjamin. No idea if that source was credible, I just remember it vaguely.

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago
[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

Correct, his name was Oily Josh

[–] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

True, but scholars do have Roman records of a Jesus of Nazareth, that matches the description of Jesus and his followers. This is a man though, but there is relative proof of a guy that did exist.

Also there are lots of early depictions of Jesus with a wand, and if you are interested in a detailed secular history I recommend the book Zealot By Reza Aslan.

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

There were many rabble rouser Rabbis in Roman occupied Judea. Pick one.