this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
61 points (91.8% liked)

Selfhosted

40226 readers
1111 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi, I've been thinking for a few days whether I should learn Docker or Podman. I know that Podman is more FOSS and I like it more in theory, but maybe it's better to start with docker, for which there is a lot more tutorials. On the other hand, maybe it's better to straight up learn podman when I don't know any of the two and not having to change habits later. What do you think? For context, I know how containers works in theory, I know some linux I think well, but I never actually used docker nor podman. In another words: If I want to eventually end up with Podman, is it easier to start with docker and then learn Podman, or start with Podman right away? Thanks in advance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (20 children)

Not sure why all the down votes without any explanation.

I too don't use docker for my services. I run Plex on my Arch install via the provided AUR package. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Nobody told me I needed to do otherwise, with docker or anything else. Not sure why that would be better in any way. It could hardly be more performant? And it's as simple as enabling the service and forgetting about it.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

People love to hate on people who don't care for containers.

Also, I'm guessing that nobody here actually knows what it means to run code on bare metal.

What you're doing is fine. No need to make life harder for yourself.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

People love to hate on people who don't care for containers.

Maybe so. πŸ˜•

what it means to run code on bare metal

I'm guessing it means something slightly different than what most people think, namely to just run it in the OS. Would you explain to me what it really means?

[–] ImTryingLemmy@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

The OS is in between the service and the bare metal. Something like OPNsense can be said to be running on bare metal because the OS and the firewall service are so intertwined. However, something like firewalld isn't running on the bare metal because it's just a service of the operating system.

That's how I understand it anyway, I'm not a pro

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)