this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
178 points (99.4% liked)

Cranes, trains, planes and excavators and stuff like that

261 readers
1 users here now

A place for all things cranes, trains, and excavators, and stuff like that.

Recommended title format: XKCD or something else. Optional additional factual info in text field or comments.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lun-class_ekranoplan

Only one built, and it's still on the shore of the Caspian sea:

General characteristics

  • Crew: 15 (6 officers, 9 enlisted)
  • Capacity: 137 t (302,000 lb)
  • Length: 73.8 m (242 ft 2 in)
  • Wingspan: 44 m (144 ft 4 in)
  • Height: 19.2 m (63 ft 0 in)
  • Wing area: 550 m2 (5,900 sq ft)
  • Empty weight: 286,000 kg (630,522 lb)
  • Max takeoff weight: 380,000 kg (837,757 lb)
  • Powerplant: 8 × Kuznetsov NK-87 turbofans, 127.4 kN (28,600 lbf) thrust each

Performance

  • Maximum speed: 550 km/h (340 mph, 300 kn)
  • Cruise speed: 450 km/h (280 mph, 240 kn) at 2.5 m (8 ft)
  • Range: 2,000 km (1,200 mi, 1,100 nmi)
  • Service ceiling: 5 m (16 ft) in ground effect

Armament

  • Guns: two 23mm Pl-23 cannon in a twin tail turret and two 23mm Pl-23 cannon in a twin turret under forward missile tubes
  • Missiles: six launchers for P-270 Moskit Sunburn antiship missiles
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teejay@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I would guess that it would survive about as long as it would take a $200 fpv drone to collide with one of the engine arrays. Then nautical drones would do their thing to turn it into an artificial reef.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In flight it's way faster than any FPV or naval drone.

[–] teejay@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sure, in a dead heat and as long as there aren't any big waves. Also, you do realize that it's possible to attack this thing from other directions than directly behind it while it's at full speed, right?

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you attack it head on you have a very short window of opportunity before it's past you and if you try from the side you'll have to be really really good at geometry. And that thing won't go in a straight line while it's in enemy range.

[–] teejay@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

If you attack it head on you have a very short window of opportunity before it’s past you

So, you have to be accurate. Like we've been doing for hundreds of years with projectiles, even non-guided ones. Check.

if you try from the side you’ll have to be really really good at geometry

So... good like as in a computer doing the math? Check.

And that thing won’t go in a straight line while it’s in enemy range.

Bad news friend, they can't turn for shit due to ground effect, and they can't ascend or descend either. There's a reason these things were immediately abandoned as a viable concept after only 3 years in operation and without seeing any combat.