this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
252 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59436 readers
3020 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
252
Could electronic mail undermine conventional post? – archive, 1 December 1983 (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 11 months ago by Fontasia@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It did for me. Mostly. If only we could legally sign pdf...

[–] Daqu@feddit.de 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Electronic signatures exist. You can legally sign pdf. But it costs money.

[–] averyfalken@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago

You cab for some documents. Some documents legally still require a wet signature

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

In my country we have goverment-approved way of signing for free. It's essentialy a stamp with code in it pointing to database record containing data about the sign - date, document hash or whatever it's called etc.