this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
395 points (96.9% liked)

Leftism

2113 readers
3 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

!abolition@slrpnk.net !antiwork@lemmy.world !antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world !breadtube@lemmy.world !climate@slrpnk.net !fuckcars@lemmy.world !iwwunion@lemmy.ml !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com !leftymusic@lemmy.world !privacy@lemmy.world !socialistra@midwest.social !solarpunk@slrpnk.net Solarpunk memes !therightcantmeme@midwest.social !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world !vuvuzelaiphone@lemmy.world !workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world !workreform@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Depends entirely on if Gaetz and his posse can get whomever they want into place.

[–] 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gaetz has no plan to elect anyone else. He was asked that Directly. This would be a victory if there were a plan to put someone in place and govern, but there is not. If all the right wing wants to do is allow the government to falter, then that is just a waste of time and taxpayer money. My guess is this will hurt the right wing in the long term, but I know, from having lived in the southern US, that some of their constituents want it in the short term.

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there any stopping the non maga republicans from voting to elect a Democrat as a speaker? If not, wouldn't the maga republicans be keen to at least keep a Republican as speaker and negotiate a little bit?

The fact that they're partisan hacks.

[–] angrymouse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Indeendent of what succeds, this feels like they showed power and the next speaker should make more concessions to them to not be thrown away.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, most of them are furious over this. The "freedom caucus", which is the small group of the most batshit insane MAGA Republicans, did everything they could to cause a shutdown that basically everyone else wanted to avoid. Their goal was to pass a budget as 12 separate bills instead of 1 big one, which would allow them to very easily slash anything they don't like such as Medicare, Medicaid, social security, the department of education, etc. by simply not passing funding.

I would have imagined a lot more Republicans would be on board with this, but it looks like they're finally trying to distance themselves from trump and his insane followers. Additionally, the optics from basically forcing a shutdown are very bad, and democrats have been over performing in midterm elections so Rs really can't afford to take another hit.

Mccarthy only got the speaker seat by making concessions to the craziest people in the house and giving them the power to remove him. They removed him because he did his job and negotiated with democrats to keep the government from shutting down. The next speaker won't be keen to put their head on the chopping block and make deals with people who will remove them the very second the speaker does something the nutjobs don't like.

Best case scenario? A few sane Republicans decide they'd rather deal with a democratic speaker than continue to tiptoe around the most radical elements of their party. Unlikely to happen, but the alternative is a repeat of the first time around which took 12 or so votes to actually seat mccarthy.

[–] Huxleywaswrite@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

15, it took Mccarthy 15 votes to win that job and only 1 to lose it