If your argument is as it is here, that the rich will take what they want while the poor die and the powerful will do as they will, then be consistent.

Yeah. Which is why it's so critical to be getting as much food onto the market, so that there everyone is taken care of.

Let Europe always speak in those terms rather than using human suffering as a political pawn only to seek their own advantage.

This isn't a matter of political advantage. Russia blockaded Ukraine's grain shipments. Everyone could tell that combined with preexisting conditions it was a disaster in the making. Europe had to go out of their way to put this deal together.

They stole their money and sanctioned them in a deliberate policy to starve Afgahnistan. It is nothing short of genocide.

There is so much wrong in this statement. The money at issue formed the reserves of the Afghan central bank. The US is reticent to release it because they're afraid it will just go into Taliban pockets, not go to the Afghan people. It has actively been involved in talks as to how to release the money without it being funneled to the Taliban's soldiers. The US has no interest in starving the people of Afghanistan. Flinging such false allegations of genocide around cheapens very real acts of genocide that are ongoing.

Stop mentioning leaders by name as if their intentions have any impact on their governments.

I mention individual leaders when I think their individual actions, motives, and opinions are relevant. Otherwise, I think it's more informative to think of countries and governments as primarily composed of individual actors that should be analyzed in aggregate.