this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
327 points (98.5% liked)

World News

32328 readers
883 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fearout@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

There were a lot of different models, including some that were really close to the timelines we see now. All of those depended on different amounts of emissions, and if humanity took this seriously as soon as it was discovered the rate of change would be wildly different.

But there were very little significant changes to curb the emission rate, so we’re currently following the path of some of the worst predictive models. They still existed, just weren’t publicized as much as those that counted on some more reasonable approaches.