science

14791 readers

350 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

m3t00@lemmy.world

Joleee@lemmy.world

laverabe@lemmy.world

DeadPand@midwest.social

118

Scientists Took Semen Onto A "Vomit Comet" Flight, And The Results Were Concerning (www.iflscience.com)

submitted 10 hours ago by cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/science@lemmy.world

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"Exposure to short duration gravity load changes including microgravity, as sustained in a parabolic flight statistically significantly decreases the sperm motility and vitality of human fresh sperm samples," the team found, adding that this may have huge importance for any prolonged human settlement missions in space.

"In the future, should humans remain in space for long periods of time with exposure to different microgravity and hypergravity peaks, which could range from months to a number of years, reproduction may pose a problem to be tackled."

The mechanism by which sperm motility was decreased remains unknown, with further study needed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Not my point. Advancement should never be stopped but us as a civilization needs push that science towards solving the most immediate and important problems.

Just a observation. Wish it was reality. But with enough social collaboration we can make one man's wet dream of being the last of humanity, while spreading his "Superior" seed across the cosmos; socially, financially, and legally unacceptable.

[–] boywar3@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Scientific advancement in space experimentation leads to breakthroughs in other areas - all scientific progress is interconnected.

"Pushing science towards solving the most immediate and important problems" is sort of a nonsense statement, as there could be new efficiencies/strategies that are discovered in fields that are completely unrelated to what would normally be associated with "the most immediate and important problems."

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 5 hours ago

We have many many scientists working on "important problems".

We do not have a deficit in research or curiosity, we have an issue with people willfully implementing policy that is detrimental. (Power, Profit, willful ignorance, intending to hurt others, etc)