Fiction

525 readers

1 users here now

Solarpunk themed fiction. Books, short stories, movies, games... pretty much anything you can dream of!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq

SteveKLord

Netflix Just Quietly Added the Best Anti-Capitalist Sci-Fi Movie of the Century (www.inverse.com)

submitted 2 months ago by SteveKLord to c/fiction

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Elysium depicts a near-future Earth in which the majority of rich and privileged humans have migrated to an orbiting space station which gives the film its title. The city-state hogs the advanced medical resources of Earth, leaving the people on the planet below in a perpetual state of lawlessness and impoverishment. Matt Damon stars as Max Da Costa, a former criminal who, while doing dangerous work, is exposed to a lethal dose of radiation, giving him just five days to live. He soon obtains an exo-suit to augment his failing body. It’s then discovered that Max has data hidden in a chip in his brain that can, in theory, alter the computer systems running Elysium, which will benefit all the people who don’t live there.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that arguably how every system has worked? Say we're going back a couple centuries - power mostly lied with banks and those who already had money, since their loans were important for many businesses. Look for example at the Fugger family - incredibly rich bankers with control over much of the European economy, and they were literally venture capitalists in the 15th & 16th century. Money has always given people leverage, the stock market is just a codified form (that still isn't fully equal due to different kinds of shares, so really no different from previous power structures).

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I pretty much agree. Every system has a manner of "be subjected to the process or the weather".

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So there literally can't be anti-capitalist art, as capitalism has no unique defining features, and only art focusing on those features can be anti-capitalist, right?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I mean, you can attack capitalism with an irrelevant argument and call it an attack on capitalism, but it won't be a very good attack. It's like me trying to say Johnny Cash songs are bad because he's ugly.

Saying capitalism is bad because the people in charge are abusive doesn't help in pointing out why we shouldn't use capitalism. Kings and whatever communist leaders are called can also be abusive and it's not because their system is inherently bad.

My point is that a weak argument can hardly be called "the greatest anti capitalist movie".