this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
185 points (97.9% liked)

World News

32075 readers
941 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Democratic Republic of the Congo produces nearly three-quarters of the world’s cobalt, an essential component in rechargeable batteries powering laptops, smartphones and electric vehicles. But those who dig up the valuable mineral often work in horrific and dangerous conditions, says Siddharth Kara, an international expert on modern-day slavery and author of Cobalt Red: How the Blood of the Congo Powers Our Lives. In an in-depth interview, he says the major technology companies that rely on this cobalt from DRC to make their products are turning a blind eye to the human toll and falsely claiming their supply chains are free from abuse, including widespread child labor. “The public health catastrophe on top of the human rights violence on top of the environmental destruction is unlike anything we’ve ever seen in the modern context,” says Kara. “The fact that it is linked to companies worth trillions and that our lives depend on this enormous violence has to be dealt with.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BaldProphet@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Biofuel is not gasoline. Gasoline is a nonrenewable petroleum product. Biofuel is a renewable clean burning ethanol or methanol fuel made from grain or wood byproducts.

There are not enough rare earth metals to replace combustion engine vehicles with electric vehicles, let alone enough to replace the batteries of said vehicles. Electric vehicles are not sustainable.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Biofuel is a renewable clean burning ethanol or methanol fuel made from grain or wood byproducts.

Can you explain how this works?

Only part of the reason petroleum products are an issue is because they are nonrenewable. The primary complaint is that their combustion produces CO~2~ (and other greenhouse gases like NOx).

Ethanol, methanol, and any other hydrocarbon that undergoes combustion produces CO~2~ (and other gases). That's how combustion works. For example, the combustion equation for methanol is: 2CH~3~OH + 3O~2~→2CO~2~ + 4H~2~O.

The only way around this while still performing combustion is by combusting hydrogen, where the combustion equation is simply: 2H~2~ + O~2~→2H~2~O.

Biofuel combustion still produce CO~2~, and I don't believe at a significantly different rate than petroleum combustion, even if it does have the added benefit of being renewable.[^1]

[^1]: Yes, this view is missing a few variables. For one, biofuel production itself can be less carbon-intensive than oil drilling and processing processes. Biofuels can also be used to "recycle" other carbon-containing (waste) material. That being said, combustion is still the largest problematic factor at play here.

[–] 4am@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Right, we’re not magically sucking CO2 from the atmosphere at a rate higher than we combust the biofuel.

The process is not neutral.

[–] DFTBA_FTW@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That doesn't make any sense to me, and it's been awhile since my biofuel class but I don't think that's true.

The carbon in the combustion product comes from the biofuel, the biofuel comes from plants, the plants get the carbon from the air. Therfore, by definition, every gram of Co2 released by combusting a biofuel came originally from the atmosphere.

It has to be neutral, otherwise where is the magical extra carbon coming from?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)